From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: [PATCH 04/10] i2c: rename address check functions Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 22:33:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1439066007-13951-5-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> References: <1439066007-13951-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1439066007-13951-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Wolfram Sang , Andrey Danin , Stephen Warren , Stephen Warren List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org From: Wolfram Sang The current naming is based on the arguments of the functions and not on what they do. Even I as the maintainer find this confusing, so let's rename them to something more descriptive. Tested-by: Andrey Danin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c index 150ee00b5ff5cb..28766b7208bcc2 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static unsigned short i2c_encode_flags_to_addr(struct i2c_client *client) /* This is a permissive address validity check, I2C address map constraints * are purposely not enforced, except for the general call address. */ -static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) +static int i2c_check_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) { if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN) { /* 10-bit address, all values are valid */ @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) * device uses a reserved address, then it shouldn't be probed. 7-bit * addressing is assumed, 10-bit address devices are rare and should be * explicitly enumerated. */ -static int i2c_check_addr_validity(unsigned short addr) +static int i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(unsigned short addr) { /* * Reserved addresses per I2C specification: @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info) strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name)); /* Check for address validity */ - status = i2c_check_client_addr_validity(client); + status = i2c_check_addr_validity(client); if (status) { dev_err(&adap->dev, "Invalid %d-bit I2C address 0x%02hx\n", client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN ? 10 : 7, client->addr); @@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client, int err; /* Make sure the address is valid */ - err = i2c_check_addr_validity(addr); + err = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr); if (err) { dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n", addr); @@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ i2c_new_probed_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) { /* Check address validity */ - if (i2c_check_addr_validity(addr_list[i]) < 0) { + if (i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr_list[i]) < 0) { dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Invalid 7-bit address " "0x%02x\n", addr_list[i]); continue; @@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ int i2c_slave_register(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_slave_cb_t slave_cb) if (!(client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)) { /* Enforce stricter address checking */ - ret = i2c_check_addr_validity(client->addr); + ret = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(client->addr); if (ret) { dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: invalid address\n", __func__); return ret; -- 2.1.4