From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] device property: refactor built-in properties support Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:40:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1448376029.15393.21.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1448360579-79260-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1448360579-79260-4-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <36215503.lOBnWKWWL0@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <36215503.lOBnWKWWL0@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Mika Westerberg , Kevin Fenzi , Arnd Bergmann , Wolfram Sang List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:22:49 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in > > bytes) of the > > value. The sanity check is done in the accessors. > > > > The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as > > device tree. > > Do I understand correctly that this is indended to make the built-in > properties > follow the DT layout? Correct. > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy