From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device property API Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1449048220.15393.141.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1448896304-87928-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20151130195858.GB16446@katana> <1448966031.15393.131.camel@linux.intel.com> <3465575.VLD33ozkzD@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3465575.VLD33ozkzD@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Wolfram Sang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Mika Westerberg , Kevin Fenzi , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:33:51 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 20:58 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > What is the bug fix here described in the cover letter? > > > > The cover letter mentioned 'last part' which I refer to as patches > > 14, > > 15 (though this is for UART), and 16. > > Hmm. > > So may I assume that patches [1-13/16] are for me and the rest is to > be applied > by the other respective maintainers? > > That should be easiest logistically IMHO. Have no objections. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy