From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 8/9] eeprom: at24: remove a reduntant if Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1449051926-21918-9-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> References: <1449051926-21918-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:34813 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755497AbbLBKZn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 05:25:43 -0500 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so247554950wmv.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:25:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1449051926-21918-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c , LKML , Bartosz Golaszewski It seems as if the second check for I2C_FUNC_I2C functionality had been introduced accidentally during a merge. Tt's reduntant, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c index 6e28b02..1288193 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c @@ -634,10 +634,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) } else { return -EPFNOSUPPORT; } - } - /* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */ - if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) { if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK)) { use_smbus_write = I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA; -- 2.1.4