From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: retry transfer on transient failure Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:32:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1452169976.30729.407.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1451320480.30729.351.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160104194949.GE1522@katana> <1451996548.30729.398.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160106044017.GB18161@tarshish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:44918 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753118AbcAGMce (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:32:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160106044017.GB18161@tarshish> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Baruch Siach Cc: Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , Mika Westerberg , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Rolland Chau On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 06:40 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:22:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 20:49 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I'm okay with the original patch putting some "sane" initial > > > value. > > > It can be modified at runtime via a i2c-dev ioctl if needed. > > > > Ah, good. So, I'm fine with it if no one has strong argument. > > So can you give your ack to the original patch then? Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy