From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] i2c: guarantee that I2C_M_RD will be 0x0001 forever
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:26:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459765571.2503.15.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459709101-24462-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 20:44 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is code out there in user space and kernel space which relies
> on
> I2C_M_RD being bit 0 to simplify their bit operations. Add a comment
> to
> make sure this will never break. Do proper sorting of the defines
> while
> we are here.
Didn't see a comment as stated though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/i2c.h | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/i2c.h b/include/uapi/linux/i2c.h
> index b0a7dd61eb353a..adcbef4bff610a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -68,14 +68,15 @@
> struct i2c_msg {
> __u16 addr; /* slave address *
> /
> __u16 flags;
> -#define I2C_M_TEN 0x0010 /* this is a ten bit
> chip address */
> #define I2C_M_RD 0x0001 /* read data, from
> slave to master */
> -#define I2C_M_STOP 0x8000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> -#define I2C_M_NOSTART 0x4000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_NOSTART */
> -#define I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR 0x2000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> -#define I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK 0x1000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> -#define I2C_M_NO_RD_ACK 0x0800 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> + /* I2C_M_RD is guaranteed to
> be 0x0001! */
> +#define I2C_M_TEN 0x0010 /* this is a ten bit
> chip address */
> #define I2C_M_RECV_LEN 0x0400 /* length will
> be first received byte */
> +#define I2C_M_NO_RD_ACK 0x0800 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> +#define I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK 0x1000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> +#define I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR 0x2000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> +#define I2C_M_NOSTART 0x4000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_NOSTART */
> +#define I2C_M_STOP 0x8000 /* if
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING */
> __u16 len; /* msg length
> */
> __u8 *buf; /* pointer to msg data
> */
> };
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-03 18:44 [PATCH 00/18] i2c: make creation of 8 bit addresses consistent Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 01/18] i2c: guarantee that I2C_M_RD will be 0x0001 forever Wolfram Sang
2016-04-04 10:26 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-04-04 10:29 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2016-04-11 16:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-04 10:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 02/18] i2c: introduce helper function to get 8 bit address from a message Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/18] i2c: core: use new 8 bit address helper function Wolfram Sang
2016-04-04 10:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/18] i2c: i2c-bcm-iproc: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/18] i2c: i2c-bcm-kona: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/18] i2c: i2c-brcmstb: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/18] i2c: i2c-cpm: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/18] i2c: i2c-ibm_iic: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 09/18] i2c: i2c-img-scb: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/18] i2c: i2c-iop3xx: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 11/18] i2c: i2c-lpc2k: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 12/18] i2c: i2c-mt65xx: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 13/18] i2c: i2c-ocores: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 14/18] i2c: i2c-powermac: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 15/18] i2c: i2c-qup: " Wolfram Sang
2016-05-05 18:27 ` [15/18] " Naveen Kaje
2016-04-03 18:44 ` [PATCH 16/18] i2c: i2c-sh_mobile: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:45 ` [PATCH 17/18] i2c: i2c-sirf: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-03 18:45 ` [PATCH 18/18] i2c: i2c-st: " Wolfram Sang
2016-04-04 10:31 ` [PATCH 00/18] i2c: make creation of 8 bit addresses consistent Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-11 17:07 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459765571.2503.15.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).