From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Seth Heasley <seth.heasley@intel.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
scott.lawson@intel.com, alexandra.yates@intel.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] i2c: ismt: Add Intel DNV PCI ID
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:34:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460118869.6620.54.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460118583-134008-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 15:29 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Intel DNV has the same iSMT SMBus host controller than Intel Avoton.
> Add
> DNV PCI ID to the list of supported devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Wolfram,
>
> This is the same patch that conflicted with another patch by Alexandra
> [1].
> We have now verified that it is the iSMT driver that is compatible
> with
> this particular PCI ID (not i2c-i801.c). Not tested on a real hardware
> as I
> do not have such machine available.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/584758/
For me seems that Mika is right and this is the right place to add the
ID.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-
> ismt.c
> index 7ba795b24e75..24c48e899a22 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_S1200_SMT0 0x0c59
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_S1200_SMT1 0x0c5a
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_AVOTON_SMT 0x1f15
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DNV_SMT 0x19ac
Nit:
I still prefer to have IDs sorted by their values.
>
> #define ISMT_DESC_ENTRIES 2 /* number of descriptor
> entries */
> #define ISMT_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* number of SMBus retries
> to attempt */
> @@ -181,6 +182,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ismt_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_S1200_SMT0) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_S1200_SMT1) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_AVOTON_SMT) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DNV_SMT) },
> { 0, }
> };
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 12:29 [RESEND PATCH] i2c: ismt: Add Intel DNV PCI ID Mika Westerberg
2016-04-08 12:34 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460118869.6620.54.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandra.yates@intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=scott.lawson@intel.com \
--cc=seth.heasley@intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox