From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartosz Golaszewski Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 01/13] eeprom: at24: remove a reduntant if Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:57:17 -0700 Message-ID: <1460401049-25459-2-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> References: <1460401049-25459-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:33103 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752792AbcDKS5t (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:57:49 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id zm5so126675570pac.0 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:57:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1460401049-25459-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c , LKML , srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com Cc: Andrew Lunn , Bartosz Golaszewski It seems as if the second check for I2C_FUNC_I2C functionality had been introduced accidentally during a merge. Tt's reduntant, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c index 089d694..001a9af 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c @@ -544,10 +544,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) } else { return -EPFNOSUPPORT; } - } - /* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */ - if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) { if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK)) { use_smbus_write = I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA; -- 2.7.4