From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: fsl: add GUTS driver for QorIQ platforms Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:42:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1467924174.32358.69.camel@buserror.net> References: <1462417950-46796-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <1465609853.22191.151.camel@buserror.net> <4094106.qfxJu3tJbO@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from host.buserror.net ([209.198.135.123]:40921 "EHLO host.buserror.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbcGGUnP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:43:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4094106.qfxJu3tJbO@wuerfel> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann , Yangbo Lu Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Mark Rutland , Ulf Hansson , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , Qiang Zhao , Russell King , Bhupesh Sharma , Joerg Roedel , Claudiu Manoil , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , Santosh Shilimkar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Xiaob On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, July 7, 2016 2:35:33 AM CEST Yangbo Lu wrote: > >=20 > > Hi Arnd, > >=20 > > Could you reply when you see the email? > > If your method doesn=E2=80=99t resolve the problem, we still want t= o use our old > > patchset. > >=20 > > This guts driver had been discussed about one year and blocked many > > workaround upstream. > > So please help to review and comment soon. > >=20 > I don't really see how more discussion is going to help us here. I th= ink > I've made it pretty clear that I don't want to see another platform > specific way to read an SoC revision and I've even sent a proof-of-co= ncept > patch to show how the interface can work, now it's up to you to fit t= he > guts hardware into that and send a new patch series. In which relevant maintainership capacity are you NACKing it? -Scott