From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Wagner Subject: [PATCH v0 3/4] i2c: brcmstb: Use complete() instead of complete_all() Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:03:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1470225791-16613-4-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> References: <1470225791-16613-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1470225791-16613-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Kamal Dasu , Tim Kryger , Ray Jui , Daniel Wagner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Beniamino Galvani , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Wagner There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by using complete() instead of complete_all(). The usage pattern of the completion is: brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd() reinit_completion() ... /* initiate transfer by setting iic_enable */ ... brcmstb_i2c_wait_for_completion() Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c index 6a8cfc1..ab4ff96 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static irqreturn_t brcmstb_i2c_isr(int irq, void *devid) return IRQ_NONE; brcmstb_i2c_enable_disable_irq(dev, INT_DISABLE); - complete_all(&dev->done); + complete(&dev->done); dev_dbg(dev->device, "isr handled"); return IRQ_HANDLED; -- 2.7.4