linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jarkko Nikula" <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	"russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for punit access
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 17:16:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483888594.26691.8.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170108134427.8392-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 14:44 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> One some systems the punit accesses the pmic to change various
> voltages
> through the same bus as other kernel drivers use for e.g. battery
> monitoring.
> 
> If a driver sends requests to the punit which require the punit to
> access
> the pmic bus while another driver is also accessing the pmic bus
> various
> bad things happen.
> 
> This commit adds a mutex to protect the punit against simultaneous
> accesses
> and 2 functions to lock / unlock this mutex.
> 
> Note on these systems the i2c-bus driver will request a sempahore from
> the
> punit for exclusive access to the pmic bus when i2c drivers are
> accessing
> it, but this does not appear to be sufficient, we still need to avoid
> making certain punit requests during the access window to avoid
> problems.

I'm fine with the patch, but please spell
P-Unit
PMIC

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> 
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155241
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: tagorereddy <tagore.chandan@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h    | 31
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> index b41ee16..91f5d16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,33 @@ int iosf_mbi_write(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32 offset,
> u32 mdr);
>   */
>  int iosf_mbi_modify(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32 offset, u32 mdr, u32
> mask);
>  
> +/**
> + * iosf_mbi_punit_lock() - Lock the punit mutex
> + *
> + * One some systems the punit accesses the pmic to change various
> voltages
> + * through the same bus as other kernel drivers use for e.g. battery
> monitoring.
> + *
> + * If a driver sends requests to the punit which require the punit to
> access the
> + * pmic bus while another driver is also accessing the pmic bus
> various bad
> + * things happen.
> + *
> + * To avoid these problems this function must be called before
> accessing the
> + * punit or the pmic, be it through iosf_mbi* functions or through
> other means.
> + *
> + * Note on these systems the i2c-bus driver will request a sempahore
> from the
> + * punit for exclusive access to the pmic bus when i2c drivers are
> accessing it,
> + * but this does not appear to be sufficient, we still need to avoid
> making
> + * certain punit requests during the access window to avoid problems.
> + *
> + * This function locks a mutex, as such it may sleep.
> + */
> +void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void);
> +
> +/**
> + * iosf_mbi_punit_unlock() - Unlock the punit mutex
> + */
> +void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void);
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI is not enabled */
>  static inline
>  bool iosf_mbi_available(void)
> @@ -115,6 +142,10 @@ int iosf_mbi_modify(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32
> offset, u32 mdr, u32 mask)
>  	WARN(1, "IOSF_MBI driver not available");
>  	return -EPERM;
>  }
> +
> +static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void) {}
> +static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void) {}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI */
>  
>  #endif /* IOSF_MBI_SYMS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> index edf2c54..75d8135 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  
>  static struct pci_dev *mbi_pdev;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iosf_mbi_lock);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
>  
>  static inline u32 iosf_mbi_form_mcr(u8 op, u8 port, u8 offset)
>  {
> @@ -190,6 +191,18 @@ bool iosf_mbi_available(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_available);
>  
> +void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_punit_lock);
> +
> +void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_unlock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_punit_unlock);
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IOSF_MBI_DEBUG
>  static u32	dbg_mdr;
>  static u32	dbg_mcr;

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-08 13:44 [PATCH 0/7] coordinate cht i2c-pmic and i915-punit accesses Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for punit access Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:16   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-01-08 15:30     ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:35       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a pmic bus access notifier Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Take punit lock on bus acquire Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:39     ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-12 18:45   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 11:21     ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 11:45       ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 15:11         ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 15:17           ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Call pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:23   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-12 18:45   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Add intel_uncore_suspend / resume functions Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Listen for pmic bus access notifications Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Take punit lock when modifying punit settings Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:34   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:42     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483888594.26691.8.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).