From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Jarkko Nikula" <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
"russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a pmic bus access notifier
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 17:21:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483888893.26691.11.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170108134427.8392-3-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 14:44 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some drivers may need to acquire punit managed resources from
> interrupt
> context, where they cannot call iosf_mbi_punit_lock().
>
> This commit adds a notifier chain which allows a driver to get
> notified
> (in a process context) before other drivers start accessing the pmic
> bus,
> so that the driver can acquire any resources, which it may need during
> the window the other driver is accessing the pmic, before hand.
>
Same comments as per patch 1.
I'm okay with the patch, but I would hear from other stakeholders that's
_the_ way we are going.
So, FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155241
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: tagorereddy <tagore.chandan@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h | 54
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> index 91f5d16..b8733bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@
> #define QRK_MBI_UNIT_MM 0x05
> #define QRK_MBI_UNIT_SOC 0x31
>
> +/* Action values for the pmic_bus_access_notifier functions */
> +#define MBI_PMIC_BUS_ACCESS_BEGIN 1
> +#define MBI_PMIC_BUS_ACCESS_END 2
> +
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOSF_MBI)
>
> bool iosf_mbi_available(void);
> @@ -115,6 +119,38 @@ void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void);
> */
> void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void);
>
> +/**
> + * iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier - Register pmic bus
> notifier
> + *
> + * This function can be used by drivers which may need to acquire
> punit
> + * managed resources from interrupt context, where
> iosf_mbi_punit_lock()
> + * can not be used.
> + *
> + * This function allows a driver to register a notifier to get
> notified (in a
> + * process context) before other drivers start accessing the pmic
> bus.
> + *
> + * This allows the driver to acquire any resources, which it may need
> during
> + * the window the other driver is accessing the pmic, before hand.
> + *
> + * @nb: notifier_block to register
> + */
> +int iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block
> *nb);
> +
> +/**
> + * iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier - Unregister pmic bus
> notifier
> + *
> + * @nb: notifier_block to unregister
> + */
> +int iosf_mbi_unregister_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct
> notifier_block *nb);
> +
> +/**
> + * iosf_mbi_call_pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain - Call pmic bus
> notifier chain
> + *
> + * @val: action to pass into listener's notifier_call function
> + * @v: data pointer to pass into listener's notifier_call function
> + */
> +int iosf_mbi_call_pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain(unsigned long val,
> void *v);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI is not enabled */
> static inline
> bool iosf_mbi_available(void)
> @@ -146,6 +182,24 @@ int iosf_mbi_modify(u8 port, u8 opcode, u32
> offset, u32 mdr, u32 mask)
> static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_lock(void) {}
> static inline void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void) {}
>
> +static inline
> +int iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block
> *nb)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +int iosf_mbi_unregister_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct
> notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +int iosf_mbi_call_pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain(unsigned long val,
> void *v)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_IOSF_MBI */
>
> #endif /* IOSF_MBI_SYMS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> index 75d8135..a995789 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> static struct pci_dev *mbi_pdev;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iosf_mbi_lock);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> +static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(iosf_mbi_pmic_bus_access_notifier);
>
> static inline u32 iosf_mbi_form_mcr(u8 op, u8 port, u8 offset)
> {
> @@ -203,6 +204,41 @@ void iosf_mbi_punit_unlock(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_punit_unlock);
>
> +int iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block
> *nb)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Wait for the bus to go inactive before registering */
> + mutex_lock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> + ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> + &iosf_mbi_pmic_bus_access_notifier,
> nb);
> + mutex_unlock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_register_pmic_bus_access_notifier);
> +
> +int iosf_mbi_unregister_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct
> notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Wait for the bus to go inactive before unregistering */
> + mutex_lock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> + ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
> + &iosf_mbi_pmic_bus_access_notifier,
> nb);
> + mutex_unlock(&iosf_mbi_punit_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_unregister_pmic_bus_access_notifier);
> +
> +int iosf_mbi_call_pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain(unsigned long val,
> void *v)
> +{
> + return blocking_notifier_call_chain(
> + &iosf_mbi_pmic_bus_access_notifier,
> val, v);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iosf_mbi_call_pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IOSF_MBI_DEBUG
> static u32 dbg_mdr;
> static u32 dbg_mcr;
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-08 13:44 [PATCH 0/7] coordinate cht i2c-pmic and i915-punit accesses Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for punit access Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:30 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a pmic bus access notifier Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Take punit lock on bus acquire Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:39 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 11:21 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 11:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-15 15:11 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-15 15:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c: designware-baytrail: Call pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-12 18:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Add intel_uncore_suspend / resume functions Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Listen for pmic bus access notifications Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 13:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Take punit lock when modifying punit settings Hans de Goede
2017-01-08 15:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-08 15:42 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483888893.26691.11.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).