From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: add a MS HID Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:01:55 +0300 Message-ID: <1490954515.708.72.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1489154315-26499-1-git-send-email-vkrasnov@dev.rtsoft.ru> <20170323204747.w2nxxrpjwypiygwb@ninjato> <20170330155233.dfnqe7d2xkr32zlo@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170330155233.dfnqe7d2xkr32zlo@ninjato> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang , Viktor Krasnov Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Edgar Cherkasov , Michael Brunner , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , Jarkko Nikula List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 17:52 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:47:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 04:58:35PM +0300, Viktor Krasnov wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Edgar Cherkasov > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Brunner > > > Acked-by: Viktor Krasnov A bit of offtopic here, but I have noticed kontron.com address in SoB lines. I would like to know if Kontron will follow ACPI spec when assembling firmwares for its board [1]? Table name LPW8 for SSDT is not allowed by spec and can't be just decompiled without hacking either table or decompiler. [1] http://www.kontron.com/products/boards-and-standard-form-factors/sma rc/smarc-sxbt.html P.S. We may continue privately to not contaminate mailing list with unnecessary noise. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy