From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] i2c: Fall back to emulated SMBus if the operation isn't supported natively
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:06:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505616.XoIl1gvLjc@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120717170243.5def41a3-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
Hi Jean,
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 17:02:43 Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:17:08 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Adapter drivers might support only a subset of the SMBus operations
> > natively. Those drivers currently have to manually emulate unsupported
> > operations using I2C.
> >
> > Make the i2c_smbus_xfer() function fall back to
> > i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated() when the adapter's .smbus_xfer() operation
> > returns -EOPNOTSUPP, like it already does when the .smbus_xfer()
> > operation isn't available at all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > index 8cfa660..16e750e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > @@ -2113,8 +2113,8 @@ s32 i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16
> > addr, unsigned short flags,
> > union i2c_smbus_data *data)
> > {
> > unsigned long orig_jiffies;
> > + s32 res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > int try;
> > - s32 res;
> >
> > flags &= I2C_M_TEN | I2C_CLIENT_PEC | I2C_CLIENT_SCCB;
> >
> > @@ -2134,7 +2134,12 @@ s32 i2c_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16
> > addr, unsigned short flags,
> > break;
> > }
> > i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
> > - } else
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Fall back to i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated of the adapter doesn't
implement
> > + * native support for the SMBus operation.
> > + */
> > + if (res == -EOPNOTSUPP && adapter->algo->master_xfer)
> > res = i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(adapter, addr, flags, read_write,
> > command, protocol, data);
>
> Looks good overall, but maybe the following variant would be preferable
> from a performance perspective:
>
> --- linux-3.5-rc7.orig/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c 2012-07-17
16:35:42.566799611
> +0200 +++ linux-3.5-rc7/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c 2012-07-17
> 16:59:55.334530352 +0200 @@ -2140,11 +2140,17 @@ s32 i2c_smbus_xfer(struct
> i2c_adapter *a
> break;
> }
> i2c_unlock_adapter(adapter);
> - } else
> - res = i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(adapter, addr, flags, read_write,
> - command, protocol, data);
>
> - return res;
> + if (res != -EOPNOTSUPP || !adapter->algo->master_xfer)
> + return res;
> + /*
> + * Fall back to i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated if the adapter doesn't
implement
> + * native support for the SMBus operation.
> + */
> + }
> +
> + return i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(adapter, addr, flags, read_write,
> + command, protocol, data);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_smbus_xfer);
>
>
> What do you think? The advantage is that we can skip the tests for
> adapters which only implement adapter->algo->master_xfer().
I'm fine with that.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-26 14:17 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] OMAP3 I2C/SCCB support Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-26 14:17 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/3] i2c: Add SCCB support Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-17 11:53 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120717135307.6745729f-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 11:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-17 12:08 ` Jean Delvare
2012-06-26 14:17 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/3] i2c: Fall back to emulated SMBus if the operation isn't supported natively Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <1340720229-30356-3-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:02 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120717170243.5def41a3-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:06 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
[not found] ` <1340720229-30356-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-26 14:17 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/3] i2c: omap: Add support for I2C_M_STOP message flag Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <1340720229-30356-4-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:29 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120717172935.45ff210f-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 1:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-18 6:19 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <5006556C.8070003-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-18 11:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-18 12:08 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-06-26 14:49 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] OMAP3 I2C/SCCB support jean-philippe francois
2012-06-26 16:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-26 16:25 ` Gary Thomas
[not found] ` <4FE9E296.4020905-kIKI1E8EpGZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-26 16:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-26 16:56 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20120626185616.7fafc53b-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-26 21:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505616.XoIl1gvLjc@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).