From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: Switch to using gpiod interface for gpio bus recovery Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:48:13 +0300 Message-ID: <1506685693.16112.172.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1504073857-122449-1-git-send-email-preid@electromag.com.au> <1504073857-122449-2-git-send-email-preid@electromag.com.au> <1506595483.16112.137.camel@linux.intel.com> <2ecc500b-42ec-8f30-b8cf-fd646eaaa198@linux.intel.com> <1506596304.16112.155.camel@linux.intel.com> <249f3801-d7b0-dd27-a838-6e7ca6967447@electromag.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:11720 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbdI2LsQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:48:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <249f3801-d7b0-dd27-a838-6e7ca6967447@electromag.com.au> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Reid , Jarkko Nikula , mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, wsa@the-dreams.de, tim@krieglstein.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 14:59 +0800, Phil Reid wrote: > On 28/09/2017 18:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 13:54 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > I didn't check and my memory is clean about users. > > So, if there are users of those integers outside of I2C core, > > definitely > > we need more patches / iterations. > > > > There's a couple of drivers using those. > If my approach looks good then I can try and update those as well. > > Question is does it all need to be in the one patch series? Depends on your choice. Either will work (at least for me). -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy