From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC and charger Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:36:15 +0300 Message-ID: <1508517375.16112.518.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20171011094121.6108-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20171019144251.hmvkaijwbgamaqoo@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:33440 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642AbdJTQgW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:36:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171019144251.hmvkaijwbgamaqoo@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang , Hans de Goede Cc: Andy Shevchenko , "Krogerus, Heikki" , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Jarkko Nikula , Platform Driver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-i2c On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 16:42 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > The first patch, although it is an i2c-core change, is really > > quite simple. I believe anyone can review it. But it does need > > someone other then me to take a proper look (and not just do > > a code only review) because it is a core change. Maybe there > > is another way to solve the problem (persistent / predictable > > device-names for i2c devices instantiated through board-data), > > but I don't think so. > > My plan is to hopefully meet Mark Brown (SPI and regulator maintainer) > at ELCE next week and have a chat with him about this series. If you don't mind I would like to join. (Yes, I will be at ELC next week) > If all > goes well, I'll merge it for v4.15. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy