From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/15] hwmon: (w83781d) Remove duplicate NULL check Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 14:23:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1509625409.10233.184.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20171031142149.32512-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20171031142149.32512-9-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <4b621f23-f251-7fa6-c79c-059b48f27345@roeck-us.net> <1509542817.10233.156.camel@linux.intel.com> <20171101230734.6zsxizhcwazffhrx@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171101230734.6zsxizhcwazffhrx@ninjato> Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Guenter Roeck , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 00:07 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I'll keep the hwmon patches from this series on hold until the > > > changes > > > to i2c_unregister_device make it into the tree. Ok with me if the > > > patches > > > are merged through some other tree. > > > > Wolfram, what do you think? > > > > At least we have couple of options: > > - apply i2c core patch now and wait until rc1 > > - apply everything through i2c tree > > - ... > > I just applied patches 1-3 to my for-4.15 branch. So, other subsystems > could pick it at rc1 time. If you are going to resend, you can add my > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang > > to all of the remaining patches. Noted, thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy