linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qii Wang <qii.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <leilk.liu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] i2c: mediatek: Move suspend and resume handling to NOIRQ phase
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:56:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1607565387.25719.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9cb5ba5-f3ce-3f82-15cc-30419bb70f4e@ti.com>

On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 18:35 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 10:01 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/12/2020 03:25, Qii Wang wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 16:35 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Some i2c device driver indirectly uses I2C driver when it is now
> >>>>> being suspended. The i2c devices driver is suspended during the
> >>>>> NOIRQ phase and this cannot be changed due to other dependencies.
> >>>>> Therefore, we also need to move the suspend handling for the I2C
> >>>>> controller driver to the NOIRQ phase as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qii Wang <qii.wang@mediatek.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this a bugfix and should go into 5.10? Or can it wait for 5.11?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, Can you help to apply it into 5.10? Thanks
> >>
> >> To be honest if you still do have any i2c device which accessing i2c buss after _noirq
> >> stage and your driver does not implement .master_xfer_atomic() - you definitely have a bigger problem.
> >> So adding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND sound like a hack and probably works just by luck.
> >>
> > 
> > At present, it is only a problem caused by missing interrupts,
> > and .master_xfer_atomic() just a implement in polling mode. Why not set
> > the interrupt to a state that can always be triggered?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Because you must not use any IRQ driven operations after _noirq suspend state as it might (and most probably will)
> cause unpredictable behavior later  in suspend_enter():
> 
> 	arch_suspend_disable_irqs();
> 	BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> ^after this point any IRQ driven I2C transfer will cause IRQ to be re-enabled
> 
> if you need  turn off device from platform callbacks -  .master_xfer_atomic() has to be implemented and used.
>   
Maybe my comment is a bit disturbing.Our purpose is not to call i2c and
use interrupts after _noirq pauses.So We use
i2c_mark_adapter_suspended&i2c_mark_adapter_resumed to block these i2c
transfers, There will not have any IRQ driven I2C transfer after this
point:
        arch_suspend_disable_irqs();
        BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
But some device driver will do i2c transfer after
dpm_noirq_resume_devices in dpm_resume_noirq(PMSG_RESUME) when our
driver irq hasn't resume.
	void dpm_resume_noirq(pm_message_t state)
	{
        	dpm_noirq_resume_devices(state);
        	resume_device_irqs();
        	device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs();
        	cpuidle_resume();
	}
.master_xfer_atomic() seems to be invalid for this question at this
time?


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 12:17 [v2] i2c: mediatek: Move suspend and resume handling to NOIRQ phase qii.wang
2020-12-02 15:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-12-03  1:25   ` Qii Wang
2020-12-03  8:01     ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-12-07  7:33       ` Qii Wang
2020-12-07 16:35         ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-12-10  1:56           ` Qii Wang [this message]
2020-12-10 13:03             ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-12-14  8:48               ` Qii Wang
2020-12-14 20:08                 ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-12-15 13:08                   ` Qii Wang
2020-12-23  6:31                   ` Qii Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1607565387.25719.43.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=qii.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=leilk.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).