From: "Gabbasov, Andrew" <Andrew_Gabbasov@mentor.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
"Surachari, Bhuvanesh" <Bhuvanesh_Surachari@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: rcar: add support for I2C_M_RECV_LEN
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:42:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1649335378392.75260@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yk7WfPUVa6l25RbM@shikoro>
Hi Wolfram,
> > Besides avoiding of double assignment of that "length" byte to the buffer,
> > this move will avoid pollution of the buffer in case of an error (invalid length).
>
> This was intendend as a feature not a bug ;) This was the reason I put
> the data to the buffer at the beginning, so people could see the wrong
> data length. But yes, it can be argued if it should be logged somewhere
> instead of being in the buffer. I'll check what other drivers do.
>
> Sidenote: It is planned to add SMBus3 features somewhen. Then, there
> won't be an invalid length anymore because it allows 255 byte transfers.
Fair enough. That makes sense.
I withdraw my proposal then ;-) Sorry for the noise.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 10:07 [PATCH v4] i2c: rcar: add support for I2C_M_RECV_LEN Wolfram Sang
2022-04-06 17:18 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-06 19:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-07 11:13 ` Gabbasov, Andrew
2022-04-07 12:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-07 12:42 ` Gabbasov, Andrew [this message]
2022-04-07 13:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-15 21:36 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1649335378392.75260@mentor.com \
--to=andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com \
--cc=Bhuvanesh_Surachari@mentor.com \
--cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox