From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B461A2B9D5; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709304145; cv=none; b=vD/d1Qkz4OgV2Wt7lU+6Kc77CdXsAF9tYs5WqfMGm+m0Pw4KmtvjRY0dc9V7hqbzvUyjEmqtAmHojbGqPGCoe3CSbiXxhitcfV9HN1PVb6HEnUfUcIHtl0W9u5jC6JteFqwzNpmdZb7Wi4CpS+KpMRdUpR3Vy9xeubM63j3oPjw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709304145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KACukKEnJXFukkXmjTQgXX49As3BIWd4peTBZp//0+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dawNzIQS4RU2K5We8S5sOGMvfxb1Lwk1/+Bjt1vMfbVd4Jl0lfpxTtLrwzRSCFuXpkDRmBfR0860hL1Qhrkf3pupG+/5/d395tOyZRvCKnAZf2rdP48Guw8/PBlFn7xYJx8E2Fj2AfV5860totF/3IxWlnAL7cHx0DVokefbUh8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dwt/JV20; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dwt/JV20" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE57AC43394; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:42:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709304145; bh=KACukKEnJXFukkXmjTQgXX49As3BIWd4peTBZp//0+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dwt/JV20KkXI8J8VpICUQOxmVPe6+NHLfVYlc86oQ9FPfArN6MtXomfjwSVPFszDH Ipu6JRvPLOml/w5gvOrbOBnU7WxI3EhmAiDbDNNTX4cGB0l6FO48YoByHfLCbNYD1H O0X4beCpos/ilRve896KhZub+JYKhhwq4g+m59H5b2itWyVx0yutBZnp/A9Go8zyPh fw/hdy0sSu2gpgvCyL/8A/kLmzJxT/1uVhypWoYPAAjGuiGYlrlbE1rf4ioJ03lMnZ YjNVpEDyWPn6IyMMLpxDzlm+BB4JLdKBWkALkximtSU9EgoQzLztKhJ5ydgOFIW4F3 K78ScNPXaX9Gg== Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:42:22 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Wolfram Sang Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Chris Packham , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andi Shyti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts Message-ID: <170930414189.2106142.4220146551084193594.robh@kernel.org> References: <20240229105810.29220-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20240229105810.29220-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240229105810.29220-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:58:11 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is > all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock > stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have > a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring