From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] DT: i2c: Deprecate adi,adxl34x compatible string Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1968183.sojkhep644@avalon> References: <1421333655-31029-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <2747724.u7aGnnSiv7@avalon> <20150302064049.GA1401@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150302064049.GA1401@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Pinchart , "linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux I2C , Linux-sh list , Dmitry Torokhov List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org (CC'ing Dmitry) On Monday 02 March 2015 07:40:49 Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>>>> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it > >>>>> encounters it in a .dts. > >>>> > >>>> Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it > >>>> is not different from 345 (which is fine by me). > >>> > >>> To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be > >>> omitted from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching. > >> > >> Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like > >> i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live > >> with it :) > > > > What happened to this patch ? > > My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763 I'm fine with that. Dmitry ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart