From: "David.Wu" <david.wu-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org,
dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: keep i2c irq ON in suspend
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:12:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d570232-af87-467e-e6f4-5b514d583a02@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1737869.ycGphUXI8X@phil>
Hi Heiko,
在 2016/12/5 18:54, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> Hi David,
>
> Am Montag, 5. Dezember 2016, 16:02:59 CET schrieb David Wu:
>> During suspend there may still be some i2c access happening.
>> And if we don't keep i2c irq ON, there may be i2c access timeout if
>> i2c is in irq mode of operation.
>
> can you describe the issue you're trying to fix a bit more please?
Sometimes we could see the i2c timeout errors during suspend/resume,
which makes the duration of suspend/resume too longer.
[ 484.171541] CPU4: Booted secondary processor [410fd082]
[ 485.172777] rk3x-i2c ff3c0000.i2c: timeout, ipd: 0x10, state: 1
[ 486.172760] rk3x-i2c ff3c0000.i2c: timeout, ipd: 0x10, state: 1
[ 487.172759] rk3x-i2c ff3c0000.i2c: timeout, ipd: 0x10, state: 1
[ 487.172840] cpu cpu4: _set_opp_voltage: failed to set voltage (800000
800000 800000 mV): -110
[ 487.172874] cpu cpu4: failed to set volt 800000
>
> I.e. I'd think the i2c-core does suspend i2c-client devices first, so that
> these should be able to finish up their ongoing transfers and not start any
> new ones instead?
>
> Your irq can still happen slightly after the system started going to actually
> sleep, so to me it looks like you just widened the window where irqs can be
> handled. Especially as your irq could also just simply stem from the start
> state, so you cannot even be sure if your transaction actually is finished.
Okay, you are right. I want to give it a double insurance at first, but
it may hide the unhappend issue.
>
> So to me it looks like the i2c-connected device driver should be fixed instead?
I tell them to fix it in rk808 driver.
>
> In the past I solved this for example in the zforce_ts driver [0] to
> prevent i2c transfers from happening during suspend.
>
>
> Heiko
>
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/input/touchscreen/zforce_ts.c
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
>> index df22066..67af32a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
>> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev) }
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, rk3x_i2c_irq,
>> - 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
>> + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request IRQ\n");
>> return ret;
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 8:02 [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: keep i2c irq ON in suspend David Wu
[not found] ` <1480924979-13450-1-git-send-email-david.wu-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-05 10:54 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-12-06 8:12 ` David.Wu [this message]
2016-12-06 16:31 ` Doug Anderson
[not found] ` <CAD=FV=VgGy5hA4+7nvLs4NPNRuopak+bTW34S6X6S_vWgtnkjg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-07 3:37 ` David.Wu
[not found] ` <a6694d7d-6fca-e5ef-7bbd-9956562132a2-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-07 16:27 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-12-08 15:50 ` David.Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d570232-af87-467e-e6f4-5b514d583a02@rock-chips.com \
--to=david.wu-tnx95d0mmh7dzftrwevzcw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox