From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] Add PCA9536 4 bit I2C GPIO extender support to the pca9539 GPIO driver Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:46:16 -0800 Message-ID: <200801310346.16424.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200801310248.41076.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: video4linux-list-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 31 January 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > = > > > > This should IMO list the '38 (8-bit) and '37 (4-bit) parts too. > > > > Same register layout as the '36 (4-bit). =A0Otherwise the "x" seems > > > > misleading... > > > = > > > Ok, I don't want to look through all datasheets ATM, so, I'll just tr= ust = > > > you, ok? > > = > > OK by me. =A0The NXP website makes them easy enough to find, but > > it's another one of those sites that tries to be too clever by > > overusing JavaScript. > = > I'm actually adding 9534 (8-bit) and 9535 (16-bit) too atm, if you don't = > mind:-) Do they have the same register interfaces? I looked at them a long time ago, and don't recall. If they have the same interface, then more power to you! _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c