From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: i2c-s3c2410: Pass I2C bus number via platform data Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:50:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20080219175051.6c8a0fe5@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080131112452.859942220@fluff.org.uk> <20080212122701.GA15415@fluff.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080212122701.GA15415-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Vincent Sanders , I2C List List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:27:01 +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:24:53AM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: > > Allow the platform data to specify the bus bumber of the > > I2C bus (or automatically choose one) for the driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > Did this get lost in the list traffic or should it have > been sent to someone specific to get it merged during the > now defunct merge window? Lost in the traffic, I'm reviewing it just now, sorry. That being said, you sent this patch on January 31st while I issued my i2c git pull request to Linus on January 27th, so it was already too late. If you want changes to go upstream quickly, you shouldn't wait until the last minute for submitting them. Any change should be included in at least one -mm (or now linux-next) release before I consider pushing it upstream! -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c