From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: ISP1301_OMAP: New-style i2c driver updates, part 2 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:44:10 -0700 Message-ID: <200803200244.10617.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1205585237-21492-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com> <31e679430803180606w51e5538ar1df7fbdfa5a0e894@mail.gmail.com> <20080318142716.74d65ba1@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080318142716.74d65ba1-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org > > The board specific code was regarding gpio interrupts, and we now get > > the correct gpio irq from i2c_board_info so when I free_irq() i'm > > already freeing the gpio, right ? Freeing an IRQ is not the same as freeing a GPIO; of course not. I'd have to grab the latest version of this patch to see if this all makes sense. - Dave > You aren't asking me, are you? I don't have any idea. I don't know > anything about embedded stuff, let alone omap in particular. Someone > else will have to answer this question. _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c