From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Moffat Subject: Re: Regression (gdm no longer shuts down) - 2.4.24.x and 2.6.25 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:05:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20080401190552.GB10046@deepthought> References: <20080325200714.GA25487@deepthought> <20080326161934.7eae544f@hyperion.delvare> <20080326173701.GA16882@deepthought> <20080326201031.7c2cefb2@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080326201031.7c2cefb2@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Dave Airlie , I2C , lkml List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: >=20 > The fact is that there is no i2c-viapro change in 2.6.24.2 nor .4, an= d > in fact no i2c change at all. So if anything changed in this driver, > this has to be a side effect of some (non-i2c) header file change. > That's a long shot, though. >=20 I've been attending to more-urgent non-kernel problems. In fact, i2c-viapro is not contributory, and drm may have nothing to do with it - the problem seems to happen with any kernel > 2.6.24, but not always. So, to be clear, 2.6.24.4 with the drm patch reverted, and 2.6.25-rc1, and 2.6.25-rc7 ALL intermittently fail. I'll start bisecting. Actually, I suppose I'd better try 2.6.24 itself a few more times, so that I have a little more confidence it was 'good' for this (fortunately, no other users on that box). Apologies for attributing possible blame to i2c. Ken --=20 das eine Mal als Trag=F6die, das andere Mal als Farce