From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] I2C driver for IMX Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:01:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20080410120141.4d220d27@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080409232834.GG1197@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.arm.linux.org.uk To: Kumar Gala Cc: Darius , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, i2c@lm-sensors.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:25:39 -0500 (CDT), Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Ben Dooks wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:01:25AM +0300, Darius wrote: > > > changes: > > > 1. Removed hardcoded constants > > > 2. Fixed bug in chip hardware > > > 3. Added i2c device for mx1ads > > > > > > Tested with mx1ads v2.0 board and LCD on I2C interface driver > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis > > > --- > > > > Hmm, this hasn't appeared on the i2c list where it should be being > > reviewed before submission. Not bothered to look or snip the rest. > > looking at this it seems the HW is identical to the driver handled by > i2c-mpc.c. (which is used on Motorola and now Freescale PPC chips). Then I guess that we want to add support to the i2c-mpc driver rather than adding another driver to the kernel tree? -- Jean Delvare ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php