From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Troy Kisky
<troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman-Igf4POYTYCDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] I2C: DaVinci: fix signal handling bug
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:08:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429100805.7f8208ed@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4816608B.2000001-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Hi Troy,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:40:59 -0700, Troy Kisky wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:20:40 -0700, Troy Kisky wrote:
> >> Do you want it changed to use wait_for_completion_timeout()?
> >
> > I'm suggesting this because it seems to be a much more simple way to
> > fix the problem. If that works for you, why do something more complex?
>
> IMHO, if an i2c interrupt happens that says data is available to
> read, that data should be read, regardless of whether or not we expected
> data to be available. So, the ^c bug just nudged me to change it.
> But my stance is not firm, let me know your preference.
I have no preference. If you think that handling the signals the way
you first proposed is the way to go, that's fine with me. But then you
have to add comments to explain what you are doing, as suggested in my
original review.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 16:58 [PATCH 1/5] I2C: DaVinci: clock between 7-12 MHz Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1209142694-30046-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] I2C: DaVinci: move dev_debug line for more output Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1209142694-30046-2-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] I2C: DaVinci: remove useless IVR read Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1209142694-30046-3-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] I2C: DaVinci: fix signal handling bug Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1209142694-30046-4-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 16:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] I2C: DaVinci: initialize cmd_complete sooner Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1209142694-30046-5-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 20:35 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-28 17:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] I2C: DaVinci: fix signal handling bug Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080428191332.371e35e3-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 18:20 ` Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <48161578.3080000-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 20:50 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080428225011.4d97736c-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 23:40 ` Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <4816608B.2000001-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-29 8:08 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-04-28 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] I2C: DaVinci: remove useless IVR read Jean Delvare
2008-04-28 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] I2C: DaVinci: move dev_debug line for more output Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080428180437.272109dc-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 16:20 ` Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <4815F951.5030700-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 16:37 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-28 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] I2C: DaVinci: clock between 7-12 MHz Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-21 3:06 [PATCH 0/5]I2C: Davinci host controller changes Troy Kisky
2008-03-21 3:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] I2C: DaVinci: fix lost interrupt Troy Kisky
2008-03-21 3:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] I2C: DaVinci: clock between 7-12 Mhz Troy Kisky
2008-03-21 3:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] I2C: DaVinci: remove useless IVR read Troy Kisky
[not found] ` <1206068770-15458-4-git-send-email-troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-21 3:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] I2C: DaVinci: fix signal handling bug Troy Kisky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080429100805.7f8208ed@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khilman-Igf4POYTYCDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=troy.kisky-Q5RJGjKts06CY9SHAMCTRUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox