From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Trent Piepho <xyzzy-zY4eFNvK5D+xbKUeIHjxjQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Two start conditions for PCA9554
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 22:39:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080501203936.GD3210@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804301422140.9894-13q4cmjDBaTP3RPoUHIrnuTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > I have an embedded board with a PCA9554 on it. It's an 8-bit IO expander
> > similar to the PCF8574 in mainline. One difference is that when reading
> > from the inputs, you have to do the following:
> >
> > - start condition
> > - send slave address, R/W=0
> > - send command (0x00 = read input register)
> > - issue another start condition (!)
> > - send slave address, R/W=1
> > - read data
> > - stop condition
> >
> > Can such a protocol be handled by the i2c subsystem?
>
> Yes. That is a normal repeated start transaction, and AFAIK exactly what
> all the other PCA, and virtually every other i2c chip for that matter, use.
> The smbus read byte data function will do this for you.
OK, thanks. I admit, I would be strange if the i2c subsystem didn't
support that.
>
> If you want multiple stops in a single transaction, the i2c subsystem can't
> do it, but I wrote a simple patch that allows it.
No need for that now, but I'll remember that...
Thanks,
Hans
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-01 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 13:11 Two start conditions for PCA9554 Hans J. Koch
2008-04-30 21:26 ` Trent Piepho
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804301422140.9894-13q4cmjDBaTP3RPoUHIrnuTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-01 20:39 ` Hans J. Koch [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-01 6:01 David Brownell
[not found] ` <200804302301.56732.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-01 20:35 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080501203936.GD3210@local \
--to=hjk-hfztesqfncyowbw4kg4ksq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xyzzy-zY4eFNvK5D+xbKUeIHjxjQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox