public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
@ 2008-03-04 17:45 Jean Delvare
  2008-03-25  8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-04 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux I2C, LKML

Hi all,

I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.

So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [i2c] Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
  2008-03-04 17:45 Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-25  8:50 ` Jean Delvare
  2008-05-15 10:16   ` Ben Dooks
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-25  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux I2C, LKML; +Cc: Ben Dooks

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:45:12 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
> and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
> than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
> It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
> situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
> someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.
> 
> So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
> me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
> embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
> most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
> contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.

Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In
particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which
my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it
upstream.

 MAINTAINERS |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- linux-2.6.25-rc6.orig/MAINTAINERS	2008-03-21 10:58:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc6/MAINTAINERS	2008-03-23 15:16:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S:	Maintained
 I2C SUBSYSTEM
 P:	Jean Delvare
 M:	khali@linux-fr.org
+P:	Ben Dooks
+M:	ben-linux@fluff.org
 L:	i2c@lm-sensors.org
 T:	quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
 S:	Maintained

-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [i2c] Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
  2008-03-25  8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
@ 2008-05-15 10:16   ` Ben Dooks
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2008-05-15 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Linux I2C, LKML, Ben Dooks

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:50:28AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:45:12 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
> > and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
> > than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
> > It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
> > situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
> > someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.
> > 
> > So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
> > me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
> > embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
> > most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
> > contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.
> 
> Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In
> particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which
> my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Acked-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> ---
> Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it
> upstream.

Sorry, my main mailbox got hit by a major spam flood, have mostly
sorted this out now.

> 
>  MAINTAINERS |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc6.orig/MAINTAINERS	2008-03-21 10:58:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc6/MAINTAINERS	2008-03-23 15:16:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S:	Maintained
>  I2C SUBSYSTEM
>  P:	Jean Delvare
>  M:	khali@linux-fr.org
> +P:	Ben Dooks
> +M:	ben-linux@fluff.org
>  L:	i2c@lm-sensors.org
>  T:	quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
>  S:	Maintained
> 
> -- 
> Jean Delvare

-- 
-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-15 10:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-04 17:45 Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer Jean Delvare
2008-03-25  8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
2008-05-15 10:16   ` Ben Dooks

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox