* Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
@ 2008-03-04 17:45 Jean Delvare
2008-03-25 8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-04 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux I2C, LKML
Hi all,
I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.
So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [i2c] Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
2008-03-04 17:45 Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-25 8:50 ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-15 10:16 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-25 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux I2C, LKML; +Cc: Ben Dooks
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:45:12 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
> and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
> than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
> It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
> situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
> someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.
>
> So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
> me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
> embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
> most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
> contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.
Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In
particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which
my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it
upstream.
MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.25-rc6.orig/MAINTAINERS 2008-03-21 10:58:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc6/MAINTAINERS 2008-03-23 15:16:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S: Maintained
I2C SUBSYSTEM
P: Jean Delvare
M: khali@linux-fr.org
+P: Ben Dooks
+M: ben-linux@fluff.org
L: i2c@lm-sensors.org
T: quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
S: Maintained
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [i2c] Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer
2008-03-25 8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
@ 2008-05-15 10:16 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2008-05-15 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Linux I2C, LKML, Ben Dooks
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:50:28AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:45:12 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I have a hard time maintaining the i2c subsystem alone. New drivers
> > and, more importantly, subsystem evolutions are submitted much faster
> > than I can review and merge them. I am hearing complaints about this.
> > It has been lasting for a while now and it doesn't seem like the
> > situation is going to improve. Thus, I think it would be better if
> > someone was co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with me.
> >
> > So, if anyone is interested in co-maintaining the i2c subsystem with
> > me, please let me know. The ideal candidate would come from the
> > embedded world, as I have absolutely no experience with this myself and
> > most of the new drivers are for embedded devices, and should have
> > contributed to the kernel in a significant way already.
>
> Ben Dooks agreed to become my co-maintainer for the i2c subsystem. In
> particular, Ben will help with drivers for embedded systems, of which
> my experience is inexistent. Thanks Ben and welcome on board!
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Acked-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> ---
> Ben, please give by your ack on this patch, then I will push it
> upstream.
Sorry, my main mailbox got hit by a major spam flood, have mostly
sorted this out now.
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc6.orig/MAINTAINERS 2008-03-21 10:58:23.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc6/MAINTAINERS 2008-03-23 15:16:11.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1883,6 +1883,8 @@ S: Maintained
> I2C SUBSYSTEM
> P: Jean Delvare
> M: khali@linux-fr.org
> +P: Ben Dooks
> +M: ben-linux@fluff.org
> L: i2c@lm-sensors.org
> T: quilt http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> S: Maintained
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
--
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-15 10:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-04 17:45 Wanted: i2c subsystem co-maintainer Jean Delvare
2008-03-25 8:50 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
2008-05-15 10:16 ` Ben Dooks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox