From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] I2C bus driver for IMX Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 11:59:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20080515115922.3290d916@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080514213214.GB16881@fluff.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Darius Cc: Ben Dooks , i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-xIg/pKzrS19vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:55:30 +0300, Darius wrote: > seems, everybody has her own opinion. Is there somebody one, who can say > how that should be? Because I have already two times changed that... I'm > only beginner, so ambiguous comments are very unwanted... As I know, > Jean Delvare is responsible for I2C drivers. So, his word is welcome:) Actually Ben is responsible for the embedded i2c drivers now. It would be written in MAINTAINERS already if said Ben had acked the patch adding his name there [1], but I am still waiting for that ack. Ben, please? [1] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-March/003199.html -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c