From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.26-rc1-git] i2c-core: return -Errno, not -1 Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 16:43:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20080517164334.6d824ff4@hyperion.delvare> References: <200805031306.16698.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080516091458.28f9f5ca@hyperion.delvare> <20080517081537.17220cd0@hyperion.delvare> <200805170653.19424.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200805170653.19424.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: David Brownell Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 May 2008 06:53:18 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 16 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I'll do all this myself now, no need to resend. > > Good. In general, when it's down to the last set of small > comments like this, it's probably easier all around if you > do stuff like that (rather than writing it up in email, having > someone like me both read it and make time to act on it, then > have you re-review). That's fairly common maintainer practice. Well, the patch has your name on it, so I think it's only fair to give you a chance to nack if I am going to change it before I push it upstream. But if you don't care, I can skip this step on future patches, no problem. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c