From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.25-rc1] i2c: kerneldoc for most i/o calls Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 18:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20080517181403.44089575@hyperion.delvare> References: <200805031751.26920.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080517142011.1493e584@hyperion.delvare> <200805170733.36937.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200805170733.36937.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: David Brownell Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 May 2008 07:33:36 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I'd rather spell it "16-bit", that's what developers are used to I > > think. > > ISTR some "how 2 right gud inglish" style guide, maybe the > Univerity of Chicago one (or Turabian, or Strunk and White), > saying to use the word form, not the digit form, except when > the text is really about numbers/dates. Certainly *mixing* > two forms would be bad, and having only one digit-format > number is a degenerate case of mixing. (Ergo my scribble.) Apparently the kernel developers don't give a damn to whatever style guide you read. "16 bit" overrules "sixteen bit" by 2858 to 3 in the current kernel tree ;) > > Please send an updated patch, or if you prefer I can adjust it myself. > > It'll go faster if you make these last changes ... Done. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c