From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH][UPDATE] i2c: Add support for virtual I2C adapters Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:53:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20080528225325.GA6226@fluff.org.uk> References: <20080528133015.GS9698@enneenne.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080528133015.GS9698-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Rodolfo Giometti Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to know why the patches at: > > http://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2006-q1/msg32516.html > > have never been applied to the main kernel tree. > > I'd like to use them and maybe I can update them to the latest kernel > version for submission. :) Personally, a quick check over shows that I think there are not bad, and would have a review of it myself (although this is probably not totally under my portion of maintainership). Have you tried contacting the original authour and seeing if it can be resubmitted? -- Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c