From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [patch 5/8] OSIRIS: Add i2c device list to Simtec Osiris Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20080602083142.5f2504e7@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080529132244.818543231@fluff.org.uk> <20080529132406.837870894@fluff.org.uk> <20080601092116.63c4808e@hyperion.delvare> <20080601213509.GH7334@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080601213509.GH7334-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 22:35:09 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:21:16AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The "eeprom" driver is not a new-style i2c driver, so it won't be able > > to bind to device. Having it declared here even prevents the legacy > > binding to happen, because the address will be busy. So you should > > either not list the eeprom here and let the legacy eeprom driver pick > > it later, or add a new-style mode to the eeprom driver - but then you > > probably want to use David Brownell and Wolfram Sang's at24 driver > > instead, it's much better. > > Thanks, I'll change this to at94. Is this driver going to be included > on the next kernel window? at24, not at94 ;) I hope so. I've reviewed the driver and am now waiting for Wolfram to send an updated version. The code looked good so if I receive something soon enough, there's really no reason why it wouldn't make it in kernel 2.6.27. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c