From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: Let bus drivers add SPD to their class Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:48:26 -0700 Message-ID: <200806041348.26267.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20080603130221.1f819e64@hyperion.delvare> <200806040018.10191.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Trent Piepho Cc: Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 04 June 2008, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > > Unlikely. =A0At least in the cases I called out. > > > > Oh, and parport. =A0DRAM sticks, or LCD displays, over parport > > links would be strange. =A0;) > = > An eeprom programmer or reader using a parport i2c interface doesn't seem > all that strange. =A0If I needed to make an i2c eeprom programmer, that's > probably what I'd do. The "eeprom" driver doesn't support programming; those are all cases where the at24 driver should be used. SPD and DDC are specific applications of EEPROMs, and they are not applications that work on parports. _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c