From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bugfixes for i2c-cpm.c Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:59:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20080623155909.525f5095@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080620084155.GA17701@pengutronix.de> <20080623124425.GE3926@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080623124425.GE3926-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:44:25 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:41:55AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Any new on this one? I think at least the interrupt fix should make it > into 2.6.26. The mistakenly activated interrupt caused a regression > here, which made at24 fail on writes. I was away for the week-end and am now processing the stacked e-mail and other real-life tasks (takes time.) I fail to see how there would be a regression here given that the i2c-cpm driver is new and is not in kernel 2.6.26. It will only be merged in 2.6.27-rc1. Not to mean that we don't want to fix the bugs quickly, but it feels less urgent than if it was in 2.6.26. As far as the review is concerned, ideally Jochen would do it as the driver author and someone who presumably has hardware to test the driver (I don't.) If Jochen acks the patch then I can add it to my i2c tree quickly. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c