* [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver)
@ 2008-07-01 17:22 Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20080701172050.16801.66380.stgit-WosDo8ZsKtpoC+DoxizDebTfikLOBL9CDsAVuJBuCrE@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2008-07-01 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
Add a new-style driver for most I2C EEPROMs, giving sysfs read/write
access to their data. Tested with various chips and clock rates.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
---
Updates since last version:
- fixed everything Jean mentioned in the last review
- now platform_data has higher priority than device_ids
- page_sizes for default values are always 1
- change code for calculating num_addresses
- cleaning up comments
Updates since last version:
- added device_ids for common eeprom types (parameters encoded in
a 'magic' driver_data value)
- removed platform_data entry 'i2c_addr_mask' and calculated
its value from other parameters
- added 24c00-quirk flag (it covers 8 addresses)
- added a flag to make eeproms world-readable (used for spd)
- rewrote code that adds an i2c-address to an i2c-message
- rewrote code which truncates to page_size
- removed 'addr'-variable from eeprom-functions; i2c-address is
now taken from the corresponding client-structure
- write buffer now allocated once in probe
- removed some sanity checks for file offsets as they are handled at
the sysfs-layer already.
- fixed typos and corrected spellings in comments and Kconfig
- renamed some functions to be more self-explanatory
- added includes
- further cleanups and simplifications
- added myself as another author
Updates since last version:
- revisited includes
- made write-timeout a module parameter
- array of clients is allocated dynamically
- removed unnecessary indentation within code
- formatted comments
- replaced at24_ee_address with a simpler function
- at24_ee_write now really waits till timeout
- added simple checks of provided eeprom chip data in at24_probe
- added comment in at24.h about double-checking custom data
- minor fixes
Updates in this version:
- move chip data out of the driver into a seperate .h-file
- prefix defined constants with AT24_
- make bin file readonly if requested by flags
- introduce AT24_MAX_CLIENTS
- bugfix: check correct retval in at24_ee_write
drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 26 ++
drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile | 1
drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c | 585 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/i2c/at24.h | 28 ++
4 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/i2c/at24.h
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
index 2da2edf..cb01638 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,32 @@ config DS1682
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called ds1682.
+config AT24
+ tristate "EEPROMs from most vendors"
+ depends on SYSFS && EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ Enable this driver to get read/write support to most I2C EEPROMs,
+ after you configure the driver to know about each EEPROM on
+ your target board. Use these generic chip names, instead of
+ vendor-specific ones like at24c64 or 24lc02:
+
+ 24c00, 24c01, 24c02, spd (readonly 24c02), 24c04, 24c08,
+ 24c16, 24c32, 24c64, 24c128, 24c256, 24c512, 24c1024
+
+ Unless you like data loss puzzles, always be sure that any chip
+ you configure as a 24c32 (32 kbit) or larger is NOT really a
+ 24c16 (16 kbit) or smaller, and vice versa. Marking the chip
+ as read-only won't help recover from this. Also, if your chip
+ has any software write-protect mechanism you may want to review the
+ code to make sure this driver won't turn it on by accident.
+
+ If you use this with an SMBus adapter instead of an I2C adapter,
+ full functionality is not available. Only smaller devices are
+ supported (24c16 and below, max 4 kByte).
+
+ This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+ will be called at24.
+
config SENSORS_EEPROM
tristate "EEPROM reader"
depends on EXPERIMENTAL
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
index e47aca0..39e3e69 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#
obj-$(CONFIG_DS1682) += ds1682.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_AT24) += at24.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM) += eeprom.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6875) += max6875.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PCA9539) += pca9539.o
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f346b9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
@@ -0,0 +1,585 @@
+/*
+ * at24.c - handle most I2C EEPROMs
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2005-2007 David Brownell
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Wolfram Sang, Pengutronix
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/sysfs.h>
+#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
+#include <linux/log2.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/i2c/at24.h>
+
+/*
+ * I2C EEPROMs from most vendors are inexpensive and mostly interchangeable.
+ * Differences between different vendor product lines (like Atmel AT24C or
+ * MicroChip 24LC, etc) won't much matter for typical read/write access.
+ * There are also I2C RAM chips, likewise interchangeable. One example
+ * would be the PCF8570, which acts like a 24c02 EEPROM (256 bytes).
+ *
+ * However, misconfiguration can lose data. "Set 16-bit memory address"
+ * to a part with 8-bit addressing will overwrite data. Writing with too
+ * big a page size also loses data. And it's not safe to assume that the
+ * conventional addresses 0x50..0x57 only hold eeproms; a PCF8563 RTC
+ * uses 0x51, for just one example.
+ *
+ * Accordingly, explicit board-specific configuration data should be used
+ * in almost all cases. (One partial exception is an SMBus used to access
+ * "SPD" data for DRAM sticks. Those only use 24c02 EEPROMs.)
+ *
+ * So this driver uses "new style" I2C driver binding, expecting to be
+ * told what devices exist. That may be in arch/X/mach-Y/board-Z.c or
+ * similar kernel-resident tables; or, configuration data coming from
+ * a bootloader.
+ *
+ * Other than binding model, current differences from "eeprom" driver are
+ * that this one handles write access and isn't restricted to 24c02 devices.
+ * It also handles larger devices (32 kbit and up) with two-byte addresses,
+ * which won't work on pure SMBus systems.
+ */
+
+struct at24_data {
+ struct at24_platform_data chip;
+ bool use_smbus;
+
+ /*
+ * Lock protects against activities from other Linux tasks,
+ * but not from changes by other I2C masters.
+ */
+ struct mutex lock;
+ struct bin_attribute bin;
+
+ u8 *writebuf;
+ unsigned write_max;
+ unsigned num_addresses;
+
+ /*
+ * Some chips tie up multiple I2C addresses; dummy devices reserve
+ * them for us, and we'll use them with SMBus calls.
+ */
+ struct i2c_client *client[];
+};
+
+/*
+ * This parameter is to help this driver avoid blocking other drivers out
+ * of I2C for potentially troublesome amounts of time. With a 100 kHz I2C
+ * clock, one 256 byte read takes about 1/43 second which is excessive;
+ * but the 1/170 second it takes at 400 kHz may be quite reasonable; and
+ * at 1 MHz (Fm+) a 1/430 second delay could easily be invisible.
+ *
+ * This value is forced to be a power of two so that writes align on pages.
+ */
+static unsigned io_limit = 128;
+module_param(io_limit, uint, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_limit, "Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)");
+
+/*
+ * Specs often allow 5 msec for a page write, sometimes 20 msec;
+ * it's important to recover from write timeouts.
+ */
+static unsigned write_timeout = 25;
+module_param(write_timeout, uint, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)");
+
+#define AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN 5
+#define AT24_SIZE_FLAGS 8
+
+#define AT24_BITMASK(x) (BIT(x) - 1)
+
+/* create non-zero magic value for given eeprom parameters */
+#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(_len, _flags) \
+ ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \
+ << AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN | ilog2(_len))
+
+static const struct i2c_device_id at24_ids[] = {
+ /* needs 8 addresses as A0-A2 are ignored */
+ { "24c00", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(128 / 8, AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR) },
+ /* old variants can't be handled with this generic entry! */
+ { "24c01", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(1024 / 8, 0) },
+ { "24c02", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
+ /* spd is a 24c02 in memory DIMMs */
+ { "spd", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
+ AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO) },
+ /* pcf8570 has SRAM only, write it all */
+ { "pcf8570", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
+ { "24c04", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(4096 / 8, 0) },
+ /* 24rf08 quirk is handled at i2c-core */
+ { "24c08", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(8192 / 8, 0) },
+ { "24c16", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(16384 / 8, 0) },
+ { "24c32", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(32768 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "24c64", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(65536 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "24c128", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(131072 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "24c256", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(262144 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "24c512", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(524288 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "24c1024", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(1048576 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
+ { "at24", 0 },
+ { /* END OF LIST */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, at24_ids);
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+/*
+ * This routine supports chips which consume multiple I2C addresses. It
+ * computes the addressing information to be used for a given r/w request.
+ * Assumes that sanity checks for offset happened at sysfs-layer.
+ */
+static struct i2c_client *at24_translate_offset(struct at24_data *at24,
+ unsigned *offset)
+{
+ unsigned i;
+
+ if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) {
+ i = *offset >> 16;
+ *offset &= 0xffff;
+ } else {
+ i = *offset >> 8;
+ *offset &= 0xff;
+ }
+
+ return at24->client[i];
+}
+
+static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
+ unsigned offset, size_t count)
+{
+ struct i2c_msg msg[2];
+ u8 msgbuf[2];
+ struct i2c_client *client;
+ int status, i;
+
+ memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
+ /*
+ * REVISIT some multi-address chips don't rollover page reads to
+ * the next slave address, so we may need to truncate the count.
+ * Those chips might need another quirk flag.
+ *
+ * If the real hardware used four adjacent 24c02 chips and that
+ * were misconfigured as one 24c08, that would be a similar effect:
+ * one "eeprom" file not four, but larger reads would fail when
+ * they crossed certain pages.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * Slave address and byte offset derive from the offset. Always
+ * set the byte address; on a multi-master board, another master
+ * may have changed the chip's "current" address pointer.
+ */
+ client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &offset);
+
+ if (count > io_limit)
+ count = io_limit;
+
+ /* Smaller eeproms can work given some SMBus extension calls */
+ if (at24->use_smbus) {
+ if (count > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
+ count = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
+ status = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, offset,
+ count, buf);
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "smbus read %zd@%d --> %d\n",
+ count, offset, status);
+ return (status < 0) ? -EIO : status;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When we have a better choice than SMBus calls, use a combined
+ * I2C message. Write address; then read up to io_limit data bytes.
+ * Note that read page rollover helps us here (unlike writes).
+ * msgbuf is u8 and will cast to our needs.
+ */
+ i = 0;
+ if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
+ msgbuf[i++] = offset >> 8;
+ msgbuf[i++] = offset;
+
+ msg[0].addr = client->addr;
+ msg[0].buf = msgbuf;
+ msg[0].len = i;
+
+ msg[1].addr = client->addr;
+ msg[1].flags = I2C_M_RD;
+ msg[1].buf = buf;
+ msg[1].len = count;
+
+ status = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "i2c read %zd@%d --> %d\n",
+ count, offset, status);
+
+ if (status == 2)
+ return count;
+ else if (status >= 0)
+ return -EIO;
+ else
+ return status;
+}
+
+static ssize_t at24_bin_read(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
+{
+ struct at24_data *at24;
+ ssize_t retval = 0;
+
+ at24 = dev_get_drvdata(container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj));
+
+ if (unlikely(!count))
+ return count;
+
+ /*
+ * Read data from chip, protecting against concurrent updates
+ * from this host, but not from other I2C masters.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&at24->lock);
+
+ while (count) {
+ ssize_t status;
+
+ status = at24_eeprom_read(at24, buf, off, count);
+ if (status <= 0) {
+ if (retval == 0)
+ retval = status;
+ break;
+ }
+ buf += status;
+ off += status;
+ count -= status;
+ retval += status;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * REVISIT: export at24_bin{read,write}() to let other kernel code use
+ * eeprom data. For example, it might hold a board's Ethernet address, or
+ * board-specific calibration data generated on the manufacturing floor.
+ */
+
+
+/*
+ * Note that if the hardware write-protect pin is pulled high, the whole
+ * chip is normally write protected. But there are plenty of product
+ * variants here, including OTP fuses and partial chip protect.
+ *
+ * We only use page mode writes; the alternative is sloooow. This routine
+ * writes at most one page.
+ */
+static ssize_t at24_eeprom_write(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
+ unsigned offset, size_t count)
+{
+ struct i2c_client *client;
+ struct i2c_msg msg;
+ ssize_t status;
+ unsigned long timeout, write_time;
+ unsigned next_page;
+
+ /* Get corresponding I2C address and adjust offset */
+ client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &offset);
+
+ /* write_max is at most a page */
+ if (count > at24->write_max)
+ count = at24->write_max;
+
+ /* Never roll over backwards, to the start of this page */
+ next_page = roundup(offset + 1, at24->chip.page_size);
+ if (offset + count > next_page)
+ count = next_page - offset;
+
+ /* If we'll use I2C calls for I/O, set up the message */
+ if (!at24->use_smbus) {
+ int i = 0;
+
+ msg.addr = client->addr;
+ msg.flags = 0;
+
+ /* msg.buf is u8 and casts will mask the values */
+ msg.buf = at24->writebuf;
+ if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
+ msg.buf[i++] = offset >> 8;
+
+ msg.buf[i++] = offset;
+ memcpy(&msg.buf[i], buf, count);
+ msg.len = i + count;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Writes fail if the previous one didn't complete yet. We may
+ * loop a few times until this one succeeds, waiting at least
+ * long enough for one entire page write to work.
+ */
+ timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout);
+ do {
+ write_time = jiffies;
+ if (at24->use_smbus) {
+ status = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client,
+ offset, count, buf);
+ if (status == 0)
+ status = count;
+ } else {
+ status = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, &msg, 1);
+ if (status == 1)
+ status = count;
+ }
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "write %zd@%d --> %zd (%ld)\n",
+ count, offset, status, jiffies);
+
+ if (status == count)
+ return count;
+
+ /* REVISIT: at HZ=100, this is sloooow */
+ msleep(1);
+ } while (time_before(write_time, timeout));
+
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
+
+static ssize_t at24_bin_write(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
+{
+ struct at24_data *at24;
+ ssize_t retval = 0;
+
+ at24 = dev_get_drvdata(container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj));
+
+ if (unlikely(!count))
+ return count;
+
+ /*
+ * Write data to chip, protecting against concurrent updates
+ * from this host, but not from other I2C masters.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&at24->lock);
+
+ while (count) {
+ ssize_t status;
+
+ status = at24_eeprom_write(at24, buf, off, count);
+ if (status <= 0) {
+ if (retval == 0)
+ retval = status;
+ break;
+ }
+ buf += status;
+ off += status;
+ count -= status;
+ retval += status;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct at24_platform_data chip;
+ bool writable;
+ bool use_smbus = false;
+ struct at24_data *at24;
+ int err;
+ unsigned i, num_addresses;
+ kernel_ulong_t magic;
+
+ if (client->dev.platform_data) {
+ chip = *(struct at24_platform_data *)client->dev.platform_data;
+ } else {
+ if (!id->driver_data) {
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ magic = id->driver_data;
+ chip.byte_len = BIT(magic & AT24_BITMASK(AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN));
+ magic >>= AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN;
+ chip.flags = magic & AT24_BITMASK(AT24_SIZE_FLAGS);
+ /*
+ * This is slow, but we can't know all eeproms, so we better
+ * play safe. Specifying custom eeprom-types via platform_data
+ * is recommended anyhow.
+ */
+ chip.page_size = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!is_power_of_2(chip.byte_len))
+ dev_warn(&client->dev,
+ "byte_len looks suspicious (no power of 2)!\n");
+ if (!is_power_of_2(chip.page_size))
+ dev_warn(&client->dev,
+ "page_size looks suspicious (no power of 2)!\n");
+
+ /* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
+ if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) {
+ err = -EPFNOSUPPORT;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK)) {
+ err = -EPFNOSUPPORT;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+ use_smbus = true;
+ }
+
+ if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR)
+ num_addresses = 8;
+ else
+ num_addresses = DIV_ROUND_UP(chip.byte_len,
+ chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 ? 65536 : 256);
+
+ at24 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct at24_data) +
+ num_addresses * sizeof(struct i2c_client *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!at24) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_out;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&at24->lock);
+ at24->use_smbus = use_smbus;
+ at24->chip = chip;
+ at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
+
+ /*
+ * Export the EEPROM bytes through sysfs, since that's convenient.
+ * By default, only root should see the data (maybe passwords etc)
+ */
+ at24->bin.attr.name = "eeprom";
+ at24->bin.attr.mode = chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_IRUGO ? S_IRUGO : S_IRUSR;
+ at24->bin.attr.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ at24->bin.read = at24_bin_read;
+ at24->bin.size = chip.byte_len;
+
+ writable = !(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
+ if (writable) {
+ if (!use_smbus || i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
+ I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK)) {
+
+ unsigned write_max = chip.page_size;
+
+ at24->bin.write = at24_bin_write;
+ at24->bin.attr.mode |= S_IWUSR;
+
+ if (write_max > io_limit)
+ write_max = io_limit;
+ if (use_smbus && write_max > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
+ write_max = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
+ at24->write_max = write_max;
+
+ /* buffer (data + address at the beginning) */
+ at24->writebuf = kmalloc(write_max + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!at24->writebuf) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_struct;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(&client->dev,
+ "cannot write due to controller restrictions.");
+ }
+ }
+
+ at24->client[0] = client;
+
+ /* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
+ for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
+ at24->client[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
+ client->addr + i);
+ if (!at24->client[i]) {
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n",
+ client->addr + i);
+ err = -EADDRINUSE;
+ goto err_clients;
+ }
+ }
+
+ err = sysfs_create_bin_file(&client->dev.kobj, &at24->bin);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_clients;
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
+
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "%Zd byte %s EEPROM %s\n",
+ at24->bin.size, client->name,
+ writable ? "(writable)" : "(read-only)");
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev,
+ "page_size %d, num_addresses %d, write_max %d%s\n",
+ chip.page_size, num_addresses,
+ at24->write_max,
+ use_smbus ? ", use_smbus" : "");
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_clients:
+ for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++)
+ if (at24->client[i])
+ i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i]);
+
+ kfree(at24->writebuf);
+err_struct:
+ kfree(at24);
+err_out:
+ dev_dbg(&client->dev, "probe error %d\n", err);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int __devexit at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+ struct at24_data *at24;
+ int i;
+
+ at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ sysfs_remove_bin_file(&client->dev.kobj, &at24->bin);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
+ i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i]);
+
+ kfree(at24->writebuf);
+ kfree(at24);
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+static struct i2c_driver at24_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "at24",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ .probe = at24_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(at24_remove),
+ .id_table = at24_ids,
+};
+
+static int __init at24_init(void)
+{
+ io_limit = rounddown_pow_of_two(io_limit);
+ return i2c_add_driver(&at24_driver);
+}
+module_init(at24_init);
+
+static void __exit at24_exit(void)
+{
+ i2c_del_driver(&at24_driver);
+}
+module_exit(at24_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for most I2C EEPROMs");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell and Wolfram Sang");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/at24.h b/include/linux/i2c/at24.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f6edd52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/i2c/at24.h
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_AT24_H
+#define _LINUX_AT24_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+/*
+ * As seen through Linux I2C, differences between the most common types of I2C
+ * memory include:
+ * - How much memory is available (usually specified in bit)?
+ * - What write page size does it support?
+ * - Special flags (16 bit addresses, read_only, world readable...)?
+ *
+ * If you set up a custom eeprom type, please double-check the parameters.
+ * Especially page_size needs extra care, as you risk data loss if your value
+ * is bigger than what the chip actually supports!
+ */
+
+struct at24_platform_data {
+ u32 byte_len; /* size (sum of all addr) */
+ u16 page_size; /* for writes */
+ u8 flags;
+#define AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 0x80 /* address pointer is 16 bit */
+#define AT24_FLAG_READONLY 0x40 /* sysfs-entry will be read-only */
+#define AT24_FLAG_IRUGO 0x20 /* sysfs-entry will be world-readable */
+#define AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR 0x10 /* take always 8 addresses (24c00) */
+};
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_AT24_H */
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver)
[not found] ` <20080701172050.16801.66380.stgit-WosDo8ZsKtpoC+DoxizDebTfikLOBL9CDsAVuJBuCrE@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-02 14:30 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080702163004.722059ea-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 19:59 ` Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-07-02 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: David Brownell, i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:22:09 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Add a new-style driver for most I2C EEPROMs, giving sysfs read/write
> access to their data. Tested with various chips and clock rates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> Updates since last version:
>
> - fixed everything Jean mentioned in the last review
> - now platform_data has higher priority than device_ids
> - page_sizes for default values are always 1
> - change code for calculating num_addresses
> - cleaning up comments
Great. The code looks very nice now, I think it's ready for merge.
There are a few comments below, but I'll update the code myself, no
need to resend. Any further change to this driver should be submitted
as an incremental patch. Thanks!
>
> Updates since last version:
>
> - added device_ids for common eeprom types (parameters encoded in
> a 'magic' driver_data value)
> - removed platform_data entry 'i2c_addr_mask' and calculated
> its value from other parameters
> - added 24c00-quirk flag (it covers 8 addresses)
> - added a flag to make eeproms world-readable (used for spd)
> - rewrote code that adds an i2c-address to an i2c-message
> - rewrote code which truncates to page_size
> - removed 'addr'-variable from eeprom-functions; i2c-address is
> now taken from the corresponding client-structure
> - write buffer now allocated once in probe
> - removed some sanity checks for file offsets as they are handled at
> the sysfs-layer already.
> - fixed typos and corrected spellings in comments and Kconfig
> - renamed some functions to be more self-explanatory
> - added includes
> - further cleanups and simplifications
> - added myself as another author
>
> Updates since last version:
>
> - revisited includes
> - made write-timeout a module parameter
> - array of clients is allocated dynamically
> - removed unnecessary indentation within code
> - formatted comments
> - replaced at24_ee_address with a simpler function
> - at24_ee_write now really waits till timeout
> - added simple checks of provided eeprom chip data in at24_probe
> - added comment in at24.h about double-checking custom data
> - minor fixes
>
> Updates in this version:
>
> - move chip data out of the driver into a seperate .h-file
> - prefix defined constants with AT24_
> - make bin file readonly if requested by flags
> - introduce AT24_MAX_CLIENTS
> - bugfix: check correct retval in at24_ee_write
>
>
>
> drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 26 ++
> drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile | 1
> drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c | 585 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/i2c/at24.h | 28 ++
> 4 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/i2c/at24.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
> index 2da2edf..cb01638 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig
> @@ -14,6 +14,32 @@ config DS1682
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called ds1682.
>
> +config AT24
> + tristate "EEPROMs from most vendors"
> + depends on SYSFS && EXPERIMENTAL
> + help
> + Enable this driver to get read/write support to most I2C EEPROMs,
> + after you configure the driver to know about each EEPROM on
> + your target board. Use these generic chip names, instead of
> + vendor-specific ones like at24c64 or 24lc02:
> +
> + 24c00, 24c01, 24c02, spd (readonly 24c02), 24c04, 24c08,
> + 24c16, 24c32, 24c64, 24c128, 24c256, 24c512, 24c1024
> +
> + Unless you like data loss puzzles, always be sure that any chip
> + you configure as a 24c32 (32 kbit) or larger is NOT really a
> + 24c16 (16 kbit) or smaller, and vice versa. Marking the chip
> + as read-only won't help recover from this. Also, if your chip
> + has any software write-protect mechanism you may want to review the
> + code to make sure this driver won't turn it on by accident.
> +
> + If you use this with an SMBus adapter instead of an I2C adapter,
> + full functionality is not available. Only smaller devices are
> + supported (24c16 and below, max 4 kByte).
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> + will be called at24.
> +
> config SENSORS_EEPROM
> tristate "EEPROM reader"
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
> index e47aca0..39e3e69 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_DS1682) += ds1682.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_AT24) += at24.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EEPROM) += eeprom.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_MAX6875) += max6875.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PCA9539) += pca9539.o
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f346b9e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/at24.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,585 @@
> +/*
> + * at24.c - handle most I2C EEPROMs
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2007 David Brownell
> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Wolfram Sang, Pengutronix
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c/at24.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * I2C EEPROMs from most vendors are inexpensive and mostly interchangeable.
> + * Differences between different vendor product lines (like Atmel AT24C or
> + * MicroChip 24LC, etc) won't much matter for typical read/write access.
> + * There are also I2C RAM chips, likewise interchangeable. One example
> + * would be the PCF8570, which acts like a 24c02 EEPROM (256 bytes).
> + *
> + * However, misconfiguration can lose data. "Set 16-bit memory address"
> + * to a part with 8-bit addressing will overwrite data. Writing with too
> + * big a page size also loses data. And it's not safe to assume that the
> + * conventional addresses 0x50..0x57 only hold eeproms; a PCF8563 RTC
> + * uses 0x51, for just one example.
> + *
> + * Accordingly, explicit board-specific configuration data should be used
> + * in almost all cases. (One partial exception is an SMBus used to access
> + * "SPD" data for DRAM sticks. Those only use 24c02 EEPROMs.)
> + *
> + * So this driver uses "new style" I2C driver binding, expecting to be
> + * told what devices exist. That may be in arch/X/mach-Y/board-Z.c or
> + * similar kernel-resident tables; or, configuration data coming from
> + * a bootloader.
> + *
> + * Other than binding model, current differences from "eeprom" driver are
> + * that this one handles write access and isn't restricted to 24c02 devices.
> + * It also handles larger devices (32 kbit and up) with two-byte addresses,
> + * which won't work on pure SMBus systems.
> + */
> +
> +struct at24_data {
> + struct at24_platform_data chip;
> + bool use_smbus;
> +
> + /*
> + * Lock protects against activities from other Linux tasks,
> + * but not from changes by other I2C masters.
> + */
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct bin_attribute bin;
> +
> + u8 *writebuf;
> + unsigned write_max;
> + unsigned num_addresses;
> +
> + /*
> + * Some chips tie up multiple I2C addresses; dummy devices reserve
> + * them for us, and we'll use them with SMBus calls.
> + */
> + struct i2c_client *client[];
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * This parameter is to help this driver avoid blocking other drivers out
> + * of I2C for potentially troublesome amounts of time. With a 100 kHz I2C
> + * clock, one 256 byte read takes about 1/43 second which is excessive;
> + * but the 1/170 second it takes at 400 kHz may be quite reasonable; and
> + * at 1 MHz (Fm+) a 1/430 second delay could easily be invisible.
> + *
> + * This value is forced to be a power of two so that writes align on pages.
> + */
> +static unsigned io_limit = 128;
> +module_param(io_limit, uint, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(io_limit, "Maximum bytes per I/O (default 128)");
> +
> +/*
> + * Specs often allow 5 msec for a page write, sometimes 20 msec;
> + * it's important to recover from write timeouts.
> + */
> +static unsigned write_timeout = 25;
> +module_param(write_timeout, uint, 0);
No longer changeable at run-time? I don't mind, but I'm curious why you
changed it.
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_timeout, "Time (in ms) to try writes (default 25)");
> +
> +#define AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN 5
> +#define AT24_SIZE_FLAGS 8
> +
> +#define AT24_BITMASK(x) (BIT(x) - 1)
> +
> +/* create non-zero magic value for given eeprom parameters */
> +#define AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(_len, _flags) \
> + ((1 << AT24_SIZE_FLAGS | (_flags)) \
> + << AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN | ilog2(_len))
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id at24_ids[] = {
> + /* needs 8 addresses as A0-A2 are ignored */
> + { "24c00", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(128 / 8, AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR) },
> + /* old variants can't be handled with this generic entry! */
> + { "24c01", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(1024 / 8, 0) },
> + { "24c02", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
> + /* spd is a 24c02 in memory DIMMs */
> + { "spd", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO) },
> + /* pcf8570 has SRAM only, write it all */
> + { "pcf8570", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
Now that you use page-size of 1 in all cases, this comment is a bit
confusing. And I am curious if anyone will use this entry, given that
its the same as "24c02", and anyone who is certain to have a PCF8570
would provide platform data to take benefit of the lack of pages of
this chip.
I would at least remove the second part of the comment, and maybe even
the entry, unless you add a new flag AT2C_FLAG_SRAM which automatically
sets a large page size (if that makes sense) or restore the possibility
to set the page size, just for this entry.
> + { "24c04", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(4096 / 8, 0) },
> + /* 24rf08 quirk is handled at i2c-core */
> + { "24c08", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(8192 / 8, 0) },
> + { "24c16", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(16384 / 8, 0) },
> + { "24c32", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(32768 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "24c64", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(65536 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "24c128", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(131072 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "24c256", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(262144 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "24c512", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(524288 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "24c1024", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(1048576 / 8, AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) },
> + { "at24", 0 },
> + { /* END OF LIST */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, at24_ids);
> +
> +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +
> +/*
> + * This routine supports chips which consume multiple I2C addresses. It
> + * computes the addressing information to be used for a given r/w request.
> + * Assumes that sanity checks for offset happened at sysfs-layer.
> + */
> +static struct i2c_client *at24_translate_offset(struct at24_data *at24,
> + unsigned *offset)
> +{
> + unsigned i;
> +
> + if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) {
> + i = *offset >> 16;
> + *offset &= 0xffff;
> + } else {
> + i = *offset >> 8;
> + *offset &= 0xff;
> + }
> +
> + return at24->client[i];
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
> + unsigned offset, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_msg msg[2];
> + u8 msgbuf[2];
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + int status, i;
> +
> + memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> +
> + /*
> + * REVISIT some multi-address chips don't rollover page reads to
> + * the next slave address, so we may need to truncate the count.
> + * Those chips might need another quirk flag.
> + *
> + * If the real hardware used four adjacent 24c02 chips and that
> + * were misconfigured as one 24c08, that would be a similar effect:
> + * one "eeprom" file not four, but larger reads would fail when
> + * they crossed certain pages.
> + */
> +
> + /*
> + * Slave address and byte offset derive from the offset. Always
> + * set the byte address; on a multi-master board, another master
> + * may have changed the chip's "current" address pointer.
> + */
> + client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &offset);
> +
> + if (count > io_limit)
> + count = io_limit;
> +
> + /* Smaller eeproms can work given some SMBus extension calls */
> + if (at24->use_smbus) {
> + if (count > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + count = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
> + status = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, offset,
> + count, buf);
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "smbus read %zd@%d --> %d\n",
> + count, offset, status);
> + return (status < 0) ? -EIO : status;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * When we have a better choice than SMBus calls, use a combined
> + * I2C message. Write address; then read up to io_limit data bytes.
> + * Note that read page rollover helps us here (unlike writes).
> + * msgbuf is u8 and will cast to our needs.
> + */
> + i = 0;
> + if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
> + msgbuf[i++] = offset >> 8;
> + msgbuf[i++] = offset;
> +
> + msg[0].addr = client->addr;
> + msg[0].buf = msgbuf;
> + msg[0].len = i;
> +
> + msg[1].addr = client->addr;
> + msg[1].flags = I2C_M_RD;
> + msg[1].buf = buf;
> + msg[1].len = count;
> +
> + status = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "i2c read %zd@%d --> %d\n",
> + count, offset, status);
> +
> + if (status == 2)
> + return count;
> + else if (status >= 0)
> + return -EIO;
> + else
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t at24_bin_read(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct at24_data *at24;
> + ssize_t retval = 0;
> +
> + at24 = dev_get_drvdata(container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj));
> +
> + if (unlikely(!count))
> + return count;
> +
> + /*
> + * Read data from chip, protecting against concurrent updates
> + * from this host, but not from other I2C masters.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&at24->lock);
> +
> + while (count) {
> + ssize_t status;
> +
> + status = at24_eeprom_read(at24, buf, off, count);
> + if (status <= 0) {
> + if (retval == 0)
> + retval = status;
> + break;
> + }
> + buf += status;
> + off += status;
> + count -= status;
> + retval += status;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * REVISIT: export at24_bin{read,write}() to let other kernel code use
> + * eeprom data. For example, it might hold a board's Ethernet address, or
> + * board-specific calibration data generated on the manufacturing floor.
> + */
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Note that if the hardware write-protect pin is pulled high, the whole
> + * chip is normally write protected. But there are plenty of product
> + * variants here, including OTP fuses and partial chip protect.
> + *
> + * We only use page mode writes; the alternative is sloooow. This routine
> + * writes at most one page.
> + */
> +static ssize_t at24_eeprom_write(struct at24_data *at24, char *buf,
> + unsigned offset, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct i2c_msg msg;
> + ssize_t status;
> + unsigned long timeout, write_time;
> + unsigned next_page;
> +
> + /* Get corresponding I2C address and adjust offset */
> + client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &offset);
> +
> + /* write_max is at most a page */
> + if (count > at24->write_max)
> + count = at24->write_max;
> +
> + /* Never roll over backwards, to the start of this page */
> + next_page = roundup(offset + 1, at24->chip.page_size);
> + if (offset + count > next_page)
> + count = next_page - offset;
> +
> + /* If we'll use I2C calls for I/O, set up the message */
> + if (!at24->use_smbus) {
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + msg.addr = client->addr;
> + msg.flags = 0;
> +
> + /* msg.buf is u8 and casts will mask the values */
> + msg.buf = at24->writebuf;
> + if (at24->chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
> + msg.buf[i++] = offset >> 8;
> +
> + msg.buf[i++] = offset;
> + memcpy(&msg.buf[i], buf, count);
> + msg.len = i + count;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Writes fail if the previous one didn't complete yet. We may
> + * loop a few times until this one succeeds, waiting at least
> + * long enough for one entire page write to work.
> + */
> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout);
> + do {
> + write_time = jiffies;
> + if (at24->use_smbus) {
> + status = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client,
> + offset, count, buf);
> + if (status == 0)
> + status = count;
> + } else {
> + status = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, &msg, 1);
> + if (status == 1)
> + status = count;
> + }
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "write %zd@%d --> %zd (%ld)\n",
> + count, offset, status, jiffies);
> +
> + if (status == count)
> + return count;
> +
> + /* REVISIT: at HZ=100, this is sloooow */
> + msleep(1);
> + } while (time_before(write_time, timeout));
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t at24_bin_write(struct kobject *kobj, struct bin_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct at24_data *at24;
> + ssize_t retval = 0;
> +
> + at24 = dev_get_drvdata(container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj));
> +
> + if (unlikely(!count))
> + return count;
> +
> + /*
> + * Write data to chip, protecting against concurrent updates
> + * from this host, but not from other I2C masters.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&at24->lock);
> +
> + while (count) {
> + ssize_t status;
> +
> + status = at24_eeprom_write(at24, buf, off, count);
> + if (status <= 0) {
> + if (retval == 0)
> + retval = status;
> + break;
> + }
> + buf += status;
> + off += status;
> + count -= status;
> + retval += status;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +
> +static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct at24_platform_data chip;
> + bool writable;
> + bool use_smbus = false;
> + struct at24_data *at24;
> + int err;
> + unsigned i, num_addresses;
> + kernel_ulong_t magic;
> +
> + if (client->dev.platform_data) {
> + chip = *(struct at24_platform_data *)client->dev.platform_data;
> + } else {
> + if (!id->driver_data) {
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> + magic = id->driver_data;
> + chip.byte_len = BIT(magic & AT24_BITMASK(AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN));
> + magic >>= AT24_SIZE_BYTELEN;
> + chip.flags = magic & AT24_BITMASK(AT24_SIZE_FLAGS);
> + /*
> + * This is slow, but we can't know all eeproms, so we better
> + * play safe. Specifying custom eeprom-types via platform_data
> + * is recommended anyhow.
> + */
> + chip.page_size = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (!is_power_of_2(chip.byte_len))
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "byte_len looks suspicious (no power of 2)!\n");
> + if (!is_power_of_2(chip.page_size))
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "page_size looks suspicious (no power of 2)!\n");
> +
> + /* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
> + if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) {
> + err = -EPFNOSUPPORT;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK)) {
> + err = -EPFNOSUPPORT;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> + use_smbus = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR)
> + num_addresses = 8;
> + else
> + num_addresses = DIV_ROUND_UP(chip.byte_len,
> + chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 ? 65536 : 256);
Extra parentheses wouldn't hurt... I wouldn't know off the top of my
head, which of & and ?: has greater precedence.
> +
> + at24 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct at24_data) +
> + num_addresses * sizeof(struct i2c_client *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!at24) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_init(&at24->lock);
> + at24->use_smbus = use_smbus;
> + at24->chip = chip;
> + at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
> +
> + /*
> + * Export the EEPROM bytes through sysfs, since that's convenient.
> + * By default, only root should see the data (maybe passwords etc)
> + */
> + at24->bin.attr.name = "eeprom";
> + at24->bin.attr.mode = chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_IRUGO ? S_IRUGO : S_IRUSR;
> + at24->bin.attr.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + at24->bin.read = at24_bin_read;
> + at24->bin.size = chip.byte_len;
> +
> + writable = !(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
> + if (writable) {
> + if (!use_smbus || i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK)) {
> +
> + unsigned write_max = chip.page_size;
> +
> + at24->bin.write = at24_bin_write;
> + at24->bin.attr.mode |= S_IWUSR;
> +
> + if (write_max > io_limit)
> + write_max = io_limit;
> + if (use_smbus && write_max > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX)
> + write_max = I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX;
> + at24->write_max = write_max;
> +
> + /* buffer (data + address at the beginning) */
> + at24->writebuf = kmalloc(write_max + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!at24->writebuf) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_struct;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "cannot write due to controller restrictions.");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + at24->client[0] = client;
> +
> + /* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
> + for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
> + at24->client[i] = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> + client->addr + i);
> + if (!at24->client[i]) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n",
> + client->addr + i);
> + err = -EADDRINUSE;
> + goto err_clients;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + err = sysfs_create_bin_file(&client->dev.kobj, &at24->bin);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_clients;
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
> +
> + dev_info(&client->dev, "%Zd byte %s EEPROM %s\n",
> + at24->bin.size, client->name,
> + writable ? "(writable)" : "(read-only)");
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev,
> + "page_size %d, num_addresses %d, write_max %d%s\n",
> + chip.page_size, num_addresses,
> + at24->write_max,
> + use_smbus ? ", use_smbus" : "");
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_clients:
> + for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++)
> + if (at24->client[i])
> + i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i]);
> +
> + kfree(at24->writebuf);
> +err_struct:
> + kfree(at24);
> +err_out:
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "probe error %d\n", err);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct at24_data *at24;
> + int i;
> +
> + at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + sysfs_remove_bin_file(&client->dev.kobj, &at24->bin);
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
> + i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i]);
> +
> + kfree(at24->writebuf);
> + kfree(at24);
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver at24_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "at24",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = at24_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(at24_remove),
> + .id_table = at24_ids,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init at24_init(void)
> +{
> + io_limit = rounddown_pow_of_two(io_limit);
> + return i2c_add_driver(&at24_driver);
> +}
> +module_init(at24_init);
> +
> +static void __exit at24_exit(void)
> +{
> + i2c_del_driver(&at24_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(at24_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for most I2C EEPROMs");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell and Wolfram Sang");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/at24.h b/include/linux/i2c/at24.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f6edd52
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c/at24.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_AT24_H
> +#define _LINUX_AT24_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * As seen through Linux I2C, differences between the most common types of I2C
> + * memory include:
> + * - How much memory is available (usually specified in bit)?
> + * - What write page size does it support?
> + * - Special flags (16 bit addresses, read_only, world readable...)?
> + *
> + * If you set up a custom eeprom type, please double-check the parameters.
> + * Especially page_size needs extra care, as you risk data loss if your value
> + * is bigger than what the chip actually supports!
> + */
> +
> +struct at24_platform_data {
> + u32 byte_len; /* size (sum of all addr) */
> + u16 page_size; /* for writes */
> + u8 flags;
> +#define AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 0x80 /* address pointer is 16 bit */
> +#define AT24_FLAG_READONLY 0x40 /* sysfs-entry will be read-only */
> +#define AT24_FLAG_IRUGO 0x20 /* sysfs-entry will be world-readable */
> +#define AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR 0x10 /* take always 8 addresses (24c00) */
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_AT24_H */
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver)
[not found] ` <20080702163004.722059ea-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-02 14:57 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2008-07-02 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: David Brownell, i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2521 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:30:04PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Great. The code looks very nice now, I think it's ready for merge.
Hooray! \o/
> > +/*
> > + * Specs often allow 5 msec for a page write, sometimes 20 msec;
> > + * it's important to recover from write timeouts.
> > + */
> > +static unsigned write_timeout = 25;
> > +module_param(write_timeout, uint, 0);
>
> No longer changeable at run-time? I don't mind, but I'm curious why you
> changed it.
Sorry, forgot to document it. When wearing my paranoia-hat, I wondered
what happened if you start writing to an EEPROM with a sufficent value
and change it to an insufficent one while still writing to it. You will
most probably end up with broken eeprom content. This is why I thought
one should better measuer a good value once, and then keep it. Measuring
can easily be done by reloading the module with a different parameter
(or hacking the source if you want to change it run-time).
> > + { "24c02", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
> > + /* spd is a 24c02 in memory DIMMs */
> > + { "spd", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> > + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO) },
> > + /* pcf8570 has SRAM only, write it all */
> > + { "pcf8570", AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8, 0) },
>
> Now that you use page-size of 1 in all cases, this comment is a bit
> confusing. And I am curious if anyone will use this entry, given that
> its the same as "24c02", and anyone who is certain to have a PCF8570
> would provide platform data to take benefit of the lack of pages of
> this chip.
>
> I would at least remove the second part of the comment, and maybe even
> the entry, unless you add a new flag AT2C_FLAG_SRAM which automatically
> sets a large page size (if that makes sense) or restore the possibility
> to set the page size, just for this entry.
ACK. I'd say, delete this entry for now. I guess the 'page_size'-issue
will arise sooner or later anyhow, maybe then this entry can be
reactivated.
> > + if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_TAKE8ADDR)
> > + num_addresses = 8;
> > + else
> > + num_addresses = DIV_ROUND_UP(chip.byte_len,
> > + chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16 ? 65536 : 256);
>
> Extra parentheses wouldn't hurt... I wouldn't know off the top of my
> head, which of & and ?: has greater precedence.
Okay. Seems I got used to it that ?: is really low.
All the best,
Wolfram
--
Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver)
[not found] ` <20080701172050.16801.66380.stgit-WosDo8ZsKtpoC+DoxizDebTfikLOBL9CDsAVuJBuCrE@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 14:30 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-07-02 19:59 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <20080702195929.GE30539-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2008-07-02 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
Out of interest, why not export via MTD?
--
Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver)
[not found] ` <20080702195929.GE30539-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-03 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2008-07-03 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Dooks; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 352 bytes --]
Hello Ben
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:59:29PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Out of interest, why not export via MTD?
That was discussed here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/1270
All the best,
Wolfram
--
Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-03 12:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-01 17:22 [PATCH v4] New-style EEPROM driver using device_ids (superseding the old eeprom driver) Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20080701172050.16801.66380.stgit-WosDo8ZsKtpoC+DoxizDebTfikLOBL9CDsAVuJBuCrE@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 14:30 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080702163004.722059ea-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 14:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-07-02 19:59 ` Ben Dooks
[not found] ` <20080702195929.GE30539-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-03 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox