Re: [i2c] [PATCH] of/i2c: don't pass -1 to irq_dispose_mapping, otherwise kernel will oops

From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH] of/i2c: don't pass -1 to irq_dispose_mapping, otherwise kernel will oops
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:00:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080712080004.GA16739@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080711182323.GB15321@secretlab.ca>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1147 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:23:23PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > Firstly kernel warns at set_irq_chip, and then dies completely:
> > 
> > Trying to install chip for IRQ-1
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> > index b2ccdcb..95a24de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
> > @@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ void of_register_i2c_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> >  		if (info.irq == NO_IRQ)
> >  			info.irq = -1;
> 
> What is the reason that info.irq is set to -1 in the first place?  This
> looks like another bug to me.  Does something in the i2c layer depend on
> the -1 value?
> 

You already acked a fix to this :) I wasn't sure if my patch would
make it on its own, as Jon Smirl was also working on fixes to of_i2c.c
and he seemed to pick up this issue, too.

(Original patch is here:
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-June/058801.html
)

All the best,

   Wolfram

-- 
  Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 146 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev