public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* class_for_each_device() oops
@ 2008-07-23 23:06 David Brownell
       [not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2008-07-23 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA

I happened across this ... it looks like the root cause
is that an i2c driver ("smbus_alert") gets registered
before the class ("i2c_adapter") being iterated.

(This used the latest version of the patch adding SMBus
alert support to I2C.  It's not mainline, although it's
been posted a few times.)


Now, obviously a trivial fix is to change that init order,
and just accept that there's now an init dependency which
didn't exist before.  But on the other hand I don't think
that it's reasonable to oops there; it's needless, and in
fact it never oopsed before!  

In this case adding 

	if (!class->p)
		return -EINVAL;

at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such
oopses from ever happening.

- Dave



=== "insmod i2c-core"
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000e4
IP: [<c03381ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c
*pde = 00000000 
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT 
Modules linked in: i2c_core(+) loop forcedeth ehci_hcd ohci_hcd

Pid: 2599, comm: insmod Not tainted (2.6.26-dev #40)
EIP: 0060:[<c03381ef>] EFLAGS: 00010002 CPU: 0
EIP is at mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c
EAX: 00000b92 EBX: f8a7ba80 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c03381ef
ESI: 000000b0 EDI: 00000246 EBP: f65a3e80 ESP: f65a3e48
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process insmod (pid: 2599, ti=f65a2000 task=f64eba00 task.ti=f65a2000)
Stack: c025bf42 00000000 f65a3e80 f8a7ba20 f65a3e60 f64eba00 f65a3ea0 c03383be 
       f8a77226 00000000 f8a7ba58 f8a7ba80 00000000 f8a7bb00 f65a3e9c c025bf42 
       f8a7ba80 ffffffea f8a7ba80 00000000 f8a60e40 f65a3eb0 f8a77242 f8a789c1 
Call Trace:
 [<c025bf42>] ? class_for_each_device+0x2d/0xad
 [<c03383be>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x234/0x23c
 [<f8a77226>] ? i2c_register_driver+0x65/0x95 [i2c_core]
 [<c025bf42>] ? class_for_each_device+0x2d/0xad
 [<f8a77242>] ? i2c_register_driver+0x81/0x95 [i2c_core]
 [<f8a789c1>] ? __attach_adapter+0x0/0x25 [i2c_core]
 [<f881a023>] ? i2c_init+0x23/0x76 [i2c_core]
 [<c013ab8d>] ? sys_init_module+0x1270/0x13eb
 [<c0131e69>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
 [<c025b263>] ? bus_register+0x0/0x1d0
 [<c0102b81>] ? sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0xa5
 =======================
Code: 74 21 e8 95 35 ec ff 85 c0 74 18 83 3d 20 23 7b c0 00 75 0f ba 86 00 00 00 b8 c7 a9 3d c0 e8 87 0a de ff 9c 5f fa e8 6f 9c df ff <39> 76 34 8d 46 04 c7 46 04 00 00 00 00 89 45 d4 74 21 e8 5a 35 
EIP: [<c03381ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c SS:ESP 0068:f65a3e48
---[ end trace c3a87e2e592c29fc ]---

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: class_for_each_device() oops
       [not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-23 23:18   ` Greg KH
       [not found]     ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2008-07-23 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Brownell; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:06:47PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I happened across this ... it looks like the root cause
> is that an i2c driver ("smbus_alert") gets registered
> before the class ("i2c_adapter") being iterated.
> 
> (This used the latest version of the patch adding SMBus
> alert support to I2C.  It's not mainline, although it's
> been posted a few times.)
> 
> 
> Now, obviously a trivial fix is to change that init order,
> and just accept that there's now an init dependency which
> didn't exist before.  But on the other hand I don't think
> that it's reasonable to oops there; it's needless, and in
> fact it never oopsed before!  
> 
> In this case adding 
> 
> 	if (!class->p)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such
> oopses from ever happening.

Makes sense, care to send a real patch for this?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: class_for_each_device() oops
       [not found]     ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@ 2008-07-23 23:43       ` David Brownell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2008-07-23 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA

On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > In this case adding 
> > 
> >       if (!class->p)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such
> > oopses from ever happening.
> 
> Makes sense, care to send a real patch for this?

Here you go ... I noticed another place with the same
type of oops-affinity, and fixed that too.

===== CUT HERE
From: David Brownell <dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>

Anti-oops medicine for the class iterators ... the oops was
observed when a class was implicitly referenced before it
was initialized.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/base/class.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/class.c	2008-07-22 15:27:52.000000000 -0700
+++ b/drivers/base/class.c	2008-07-23 16:39:58.000000000 -0700
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int class_for_each_device(struct class *
 	struct device *dev;
 	int error = 0;
 
-	if (!class)
+	if (!class || !class->p)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	mutex_lock(&class->p->class_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->p->class_devices, node) {
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ struct device *class_find_device(struct 
 	struct device *dev;
 	int found = 0;
 
-	if (!class)
+	if (!class || !class->p)
 		return NULL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&class->p->class_mutex);


_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-23 23:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-23 23:06 class_for_each_device() oops David Brownell
     [not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-23 23:18   ` Greg KH
     [not found]     ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-23 23:43       ` David Brownell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox