* class_for_each_device() oops
@ 2008-07-23 23:06 David Brownell
[not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2008-07-23 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA
I happened across this ... it looks like the root cause
is that an i2c driver ("smbus_alert") gets registered
before the class ("i2c_adapter") being iterated.
(This used the latest version of the patch adding SMBus
alert support to I2C. It's not mainline, although it's
been posted a few times.)
Now, obviously a trivial fix is to change that init order,
and just accept that there's now an init dependency which
didn't exist before. But on the other hand I don't think
that it's reasonable to oops there; it's needless, and in
fact it never oopsed before!
In this case adding
if (!class->p)
return -EINVAL;
at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such
oopses from ever happening.
- Dave
=== "insmod i2c-core"
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000e4
IP: [<c03381ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT
Modules linked in: i2c_core(+) loop forcedeth ehci_hcd ohci_hcd
Pid: 2599, comm: insmod Not tainted (2.6.26-dev #40)
EIP: 0060:[<c03381ef>] EFLAGS: 00010002 CPU: 0
EIP is at mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c
EAX: 00000b92 EBX: f8a7ba80 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c03381ef
ESI: 000000b0 EDI: 00000246 EBP: f65a3e80 ESP: f65a3e48
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process insmod (pid: 2599, ti=f65a2000 task=f64eba00 task.ti=f65a2000)
Stack: c025bf42 00000000 f65a3e80 f8a7ba20 f65a3e60 f64eba00 f65a3ea0 c03383be
f8a77226 00000000 f8a7ba58 f8a7ba80 00000000 f8a7bb00 f65a3e9c c025bf42
f8a7ba80 ffffffea f8a7ba80 00000000 f8a60e40 f65a3eb0 f8a77242 f8a789c1
Call Trace:
[<c025bf42>] ? class_for_each_device+0x2d/0xad
[<c03383be>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x234/0x23c
[<f8a77226>] ? i2c_register_driver+0x65/0x95 [i2c_core]
[<c025bf42>] ? class_for_each_device+0x2d/0xad
[<f8a77242>] ? i2c_register_driver+0x81/0x95 [i2c_core]
[<f8a789c1>] ? __attach_adapter+0x0/0x25 [i2c_core]
[<f881a023>] ? i2c_init+0x23/0x76 [i2c_core]
[<c013ab8d>] ? sys_init_module+0x1270/0x13eb
[<c0131e69>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
[<c025b263>] ? bus_register+0x0/0x1d0
[<c0102b81>] ? sysenter_past_esp+0x6a/0xa5
=======================
Code: 74 21 e8 95 35 ec ff 85 c0 74 18 83 3d 20 23 7b c0 00 75 0f ba 86 00 00 00 b8 c7 a9 3d c0 e8 87 0a de ff 9c 5f fa e8 6f 9c df ff <39> 76 34 8d 46 04 c7 46 04 00 00 00 00 89 45 d4 74 21 e8 5a 35
EIP: [<c03381ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x23c SS:ESP 0068:f65a3e48
---[ end trace c3a87e2e592c29fc ]---
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: class_for_each_device() oops [not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-07-23 23:18 ` Greg KH [not found] ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2008-07-23 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Brownell; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:06:47PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I happened across this ... it looks like the root cause > is that an i2c driver ("smbus_alert") gets registered > before the class ("i2c_adapter") being iterated. > > (This used the latest version of the patch adding SMBus > alert support to I2C. It's not mainline, although it's > been posted a few times.) > > > Now, obviously a trivial fix is to change that init order, > and just accept that there's now an init dependency which > didn't exist before. But on the other hand I don't think > that it's reasonable to oops there; it's needless, and in > fact it never oopsed before! > > In this case adding > > if (!class->p) > return -EINVAL; > > at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such > oopses from ever happening. Makes sense, care to send a real patch for this? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: class_for_each_device() oops [not found] ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-07-23 23:43 ` David Brownell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David Brownell @ 2008-07-23 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > In this case adding > > > > if (!class->p) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > at the top of class_for_each_device() would prevent such > > oopses from ever happening. > > Makes sense, care to send a real patch for this? Here you go ... I noticed another place with the same type of oops-affinity, and fixed that too. ===== CUT HERE From: David Brownell <dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> Anti-oops medicine for the class iterators ... the oops was observed when a class was implicitly referenced before it was initialized. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> --- drivers/base/class.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/base/class.c 2008-07-22 15:27:52.000000000 -0700 +++ b/drivers/base/class.c 2008-07-23 16:39:58.000000000 -0700 @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int class_for_each_device(struct class * struct device *dev; int error = 0; - if (!class) + if (!class || !class->p) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&class->p->class_mutex); list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->p->class_devices, node) { @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ struct device *class_find_device(struct struct device *dev; int found = 0; - if (!class) + if (!class || !class->p) return NULL; mutex_lock(&class->p->class_mutex); _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-23 23:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-23 23:06 class_for_each_device() oops David Brownell
[not found] ` <200807231606.48016.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-23 23:18 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20080723231859.GB30234-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-23 23:43 ` David Brownell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox