From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Marco Aurelio da Costa <costa-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: pca9665
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:56:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919115605.GE4307@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D38EF5.60303-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]
Hi Marco,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:37:25AM -0300, Marco Aurelio da Costa wrote:
> I will have to understand the buffered mode first, but at worse I will
> have to check which mode is being used and add another logic path.
Yes, let's hope it can be worked into the current logic then...
> My ideas was to share the platform and the isa code. This is easy
> enough. For the PCA9665, the platform will not define the reset
> function, and the algorithm will not even try use it.
Okay, got it. I agree.
> I can do that then. We should then pass the frequency. For the 9564, I
> will just accept the chip defined frequencies.
Sounds like the right way to do it. I just wonder if we simply can
enforce this change of platform_data or if we should provide some
transition feature. Jean, Ben, others, what are your experiences?
> That is also my view. I will start coding, and will send you the patch
> for review later.
Happy hacking! :D
Bye,
Wolfram
--
Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-17 15:30 pca9665 Marco Aurelio da Costa
[not found] ` <48D12295.8080008-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 10:08 ` pca9665 Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20080919100819.GC4307-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 11:37 ` pca9665 Marco Aurelio da Costa
[not found] ` <48D38EF5.60303-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 11:56 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
[not found] ` <20080919115605.GE4307-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 12:09 ` pca9665 Marco Aurelio da Costa
[not found] ` <48D39691.1070905-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-19 12:32 ` pca9665 Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080919115605.GE4307@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=costa-nrw9SyMmU14AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox