From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OF: add fsl,mcu-mpc8349emitx to the exception list Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:44:02 +0400 Message-ID: <20081006184402.GA13392@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20080923141219.GA31262@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080930124424.GA6878@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20081001132248.191e92b3@hyperion.delvare> <20081001113948.GA20115@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20081006172831.GA27233@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20081006173158.GA11208@secretlab.ca> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081006173158.GA11208@secretlab.ca> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Jean Delvare , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ben Dooks , i2c@lm-sensors.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:31:58AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:31PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:39:48PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Any issues with this or the second patch? Can we merge them? > > > > > > > > I do not have the time to review these patches (and, honestly, have no > > > > interest in them.) So I will not merge them but I have no objection to > > > > them being merged by somebody else. > > > > > > Ok, thanks for the sincerity.. ;-) > > > > > > Kumar, could you pick up the two patches via the patchworks? > > > > > > [1/2] OF: add fsl,mcu-mpc8349emitx to the exception list > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1105/ > > > > > Since I've been involved with the i2c of bindings, I can pick this one up. Much appreciated, thanks! > > > [2/2] i2c: MPC8349E-mITX Power Management and GPIO expander driver > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1106/ > > But I'm not involved enough with this one, so it should go through > kumar. That's fine, the first and second patches could go separate trees since it won't break the build. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2