From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
i2c@lm-sensors.org, Juha Yrjola <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:35:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081017153557.GI15820@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930145100.62fdb0fa.jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1308 bytes --]
* Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> [080930 04:52]:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:21:00 +0100
> "ext Ben Dooks" <ben-linux@fluff.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:53:47AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
> > >
> > > If there is a signal pending and wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
> > > terminates with -ERESTARTSYS, we return and disable the i2c clocks in
> > > omap_i2c_xfer.
> > >
> > > If we terminate before sending last i2c message with a stop condition, the
> > > bus remains busy and we are not able to send new messages into bus with
> > > successive omap_i2c_xfer calls. Therefore a pending signal is not caught
> > > here and we return only because of timeout or i2c error.
> >
> > I assume that this is preferable to aborting an transfer when the
> > signal is caught (if possible) ?
> >
> Most probably yes as long as the stop condition is generated
> successfully. IRCC bug behind this fix, OMAP I2C went into bus
> arbitration without code able to recover easily or something like that.
>
> Would it be ok to let this fix as now, probably adding FIXME line near
> wait_for_completion_timeout so that we don't break anything now but
> note that this is not optimal fix?
Here's this one updated with a comment.
Tony
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-i2c-omap-Do-not-use-interruptible-wait-call-in-omap.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1670 bytes --]
>From d93aaaf440acb6705c2eac4fc7ee8c9a4f32580f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:16:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg
If there is a signal pending and wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout
terminates with -ERESTARTSYS, we return and disable the i2c clocks in
omap_i2c_xfer.
If we terminate before sending last i2c message with a stop condition, the
bus remains busy and we are not able to send new messages into bus with
successive omap_i2c_xfer calls. Therefore a pending signal is not caught
here and we return only because of timeout or i2c error.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Juha Yrjola <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 608038d..17476ec 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -328,8 +328,12 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
w |= OMAP_I2C_CON_STP;
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, w);
- r = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
- OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+ /*
+ * REVISIT: We should abort the transfer on signals, but the bus goes
+ * into arbitration and we're currently unable to recover from it.
+ */
+ r = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
+ OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
dev->buf_len = 0;
if (r < 0)
return r;
--
1.5.6.rc3.21.g8c6b5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-17 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 7:53 [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] i2c-omap: Close suspected race between omap_i2c_idle() and omap_i2c_isr() Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] i2c-omap: Add high-speed support to omap-i2c Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c-omap: Add support on 34xx Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] i2c-omap: Mark init-only functions as __init Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] i2c-omap: Don't compile in OMAP15xx I2C ISR for non-OMAP15xx builds Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 7:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 11:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap, v3 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:31 ` [i2c] [PATCH 8/8] i2c-omap: Clean-up i2c-omap Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:41 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <1222329234-31473-9-git-send-email-tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-17 15:47 ` [PATCH 9/8] i2c-omap: fix I2C timeouts due to recursive omap_i2c_{un, }idle() Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:29 ` [i2c] [PATCH 7/8] i2c-omap: Don't compile in OMAP15xx I2C ISR for non-OMAP15xx builds Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 23:06 ` David Brownell
2008-09-30 5:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-09-30 5:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2008-10-17 15:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:30 ` [i2c] [PATCH 6/8] i2c-omap: Mark init-only functions as __init Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-17 17:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:28 ` [i2c] [PATCH 5/8] i2c-omap: Add support on 34xx Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-25 11:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap, v3 Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:27 ` [i2c] [PATCH 4/8] i2c-omap: FIFO handling support and broken hw workaround for i2c-omap Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 22:25 ` [i2c] [PATCH 3/8] i2c-omap: Add high-speed support to omap-i2c Ben Dooks
2008-10-17 15:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-09-29 22:21 ` [i2c] [PATCH 2/8] i2c-omap: Close suspected race between omap_i2c_idle() and omap_i2c_isr() Ben Dooks
2008-09-29 22:21 ` [i2c] [PATCH 1/8] i2c-omap: Do not use interruptible wait call in omap_i2c_xfer_msg Ben Dooks
2008-09-30 11:51 ` Jarkko Nikula
2008-10-17 15:35 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2008-09-29 22:23 ` [i2c] [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2 Ben Dooks
2008-09-30 5:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-17 16:04 ` git-pull request for i2c-omap changes (Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/8] Updates for i2c-omap from linux-omap tree for review, v2) Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081017153557.GI15820@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@nokia.com \
--cc=juha.yrjola@solidboot.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox