From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Ed Swierk <eswierk-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
Alessandro Zummo
<a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
BARRE Sebastien <sbarre-6lXSvc0s5hDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:24:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090107142426.4be04d4d@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231177261.13443.20.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
Hi Ed,
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:41:01 -0800, Ed Swierk wrote:
> [Resent to correct linux-i2c address]
>
> Following up to Sebastien Barre's recent patch, here I go one step
> further, replacing i2c block transfers with SMBus byte transfers.
Please, no. Adding a compatibility quirk may be acceptable, but forcing
everyone to use it instead of the more efficient original code is not
fair.
> Sticking to pure SMBus makes the driver work on our board, which has an
> nVidia SMBus controller driving a DS1339; nforce2 controllers
> unfortunately don't support any flavor of i2c block transfer.
Are you certain the nForce2 controllers can't do it? The i2c-nforce2
driver doesn't implement it, but this doesn't mean the hardware can't
do it. I don't have any datasheet for these chips, but I know their
SMBus implementation is very similar to those of the AMD 8111, and
i2c-amd8111 has support for I2C block reads and writes. I think it
would be worth giving it a try, by copying the i2c-amd8111
implementation into the i2c-nforce2 driver and seeing if it happens to
just work. If it works, that would be more elegant than your proposed
hack to the rtc-ds1307 driver.
> Reading or writing registers repeatedly until they stick is rather
> nauseating but I'm aiming for correctness if not elegance. I would
> appreciate any suggestions for improvement.
See above.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 17:41 [PATCH] rtc-ds1307: True SMBus compatibility Ed Swierk
2009-01-06 22:48 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <1231177261.13443.20.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 13:24 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
[not found] ` <20090107142426.4be04d4d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:22 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <9ae48b020901070722l77bebc6boc8fa2fd0bcc8da28-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:27 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090107162709.755982c0-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:43 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <9ae48b020901070743x1a5eaf72k5314cd969dc580ef-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-07 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-19 23:59 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <1232409577.25123.11.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-20 10:43 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090120114304.3b956189-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 6:33 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] ` <1232951630.1329.4.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 9:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 21:06 ` David Brownell
[not found] ` <200901261306.21059.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-26 21:54 ` Ed Swierk
[not found] <1231176979.13443.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <C1C62166118DFA4A8BBA01A2411F0D171224AECDC1@PRI-MBX-101.dom1.vinci-energies.net>
[not found] ` <C1C62166118DFA4A8BBA01A2411F0D171224AECDC1-iGzfJtNnmHkUlixSki3fykIJAyBIbWHDnAJcWxkt5PDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-06 22:13 ` Ed Swierk
2009-01-07 14:22 ` BARRE Sebastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090107142426.4be04d4d@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eswierk-BGArkANP9klv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sbarre-6lXSvc0s5hDQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox