From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: Move eeprom drivers to drivers/misc/eeprom Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:04:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20090127090442.35190667@hyperion.delvare> References: <1232446982-7842-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <200901262355.27913.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200901262355.27913.david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Brownell Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, rt2400-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:55:27 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > This patch series carries out the proposal and while at it, moves an > > eeprom driver which was already in drivers/misc to the new location. > > > > No code inside the drivers was changed and everything was > > succesfully compile-tested. > > Now that thhis is in mainline ... I suggest two more changes: > > - at24 (i2c eeprom) doesn't need to be EXPERIMENTAL > > - we still need interfaces whereby kernel code can be > given handles to the EEPROM devices, and then use > them to read board config data out during boot. > > Obviously, the first one is easy. ;) Indeed, but where's the patch? Oh, and thank you for volunteering to maintain the eeprom drivers ;) -- Jean Delvare