From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: New home for i2c-tools (RFC) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:56:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20090129165615.GJ32148@atomide.com> References: <20090129103717.025661db@hyperion.delvare> <20090129163039.GF32057@pengutronix.de> <20090129163845.GC32148@atomide.com> <200901291148.06805.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901291148.06805.vapier-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Wolfram Sang , Jean Delvare , Linux I2C , Paul Goyette List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org * Mike Frysinger [090129 08:48]: > On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:38:46 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Wolfram Sang [090129 08:31]: > > > > Sourceforge is fat and slow and their mailing lists are filled up with > > > > > > It is slow at times and even had annoying downtimes. Let's just hope the > > > alternatives won't grow that big ;) > > > > A git tree at kernel.org and a mailing list at vger.kernel.org works > > well. You could have separate branches in the master git tree and > > automatically fetch other people's branches in to that with minor > > scripting. > > but no tracker system. any package that wants to integrate/work with > downstream distros needs a tracker. things get lost on mailing lists. Maybe patchwork + bugzilla could do the job? http://patchwork.kernel.org/ Tony