From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: New home for i2c-tools (RFC) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:28:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20090129172812.22c3d301@hyperion.delvare> References: <20090129103717.025661db@hyperion.delvare> <200901291056.12963.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200901291056.12963.vapier-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Linux I2C , Paul Goyette List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 29 January 2009 04:37:17 Jean Delvare wrote: > > And there are other options available, such as Gna! or BerliOS. Never > > used these myself though. > > > > [2] https://gna.org/ > > [3] http://developer.berlios.de/ > > > > As far as I am concerned, I can live with all options, but what I > > really want to know is: which option would potential future > > contributors prefer? Please speak up if you care! > > any reason for not looking at sf.net ? they provide svn and everything else > needed ... they dont provide git currently though so an easy upgrade path like > is available with berlios is out of the question. Sourceforge is fat and slow and their mailing lists are filled up with spam. I have had too much trouble with that site as a user in the past so I did not even consider it as an option as a developer. > a quick survey based on packages in gentoo shows sf.net is significantly more > popular atm than berlios and gna (combined even). I'm not surprised, Sourceforge is really big. Probably berlios is essentially popular in Germany and gna essentially popular in France. > but yes, i could live with any of those sites ... Thanks, -- Jean Delvare