From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: do not allow interruptions when waiting for I2C to complete Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:10:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20090210171000.1f45cc2d@hyperion.delvare> References: <1233928837-3401-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20090210165554.0da8bf7c@hyperion.delvare> <4991A4F2.8030506@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4991A4F2.8030506-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ben Dooks , Kumar Gala List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:01:54 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > No, that's something for either Ben Dooks (Cc'd) or the powerpc tree. > > This patch has nothing to do with ARM, so Kumar will pick it up, if you > ACK it. Why are you mentioning ARM? >>From MAINTAINERS: I2C SUBSYSTEM P: Jean Delvare (PC drivers, core) M: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org P: Ben Dooks (embedded platforms) M: ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To the best of my knowledge i2c-mpc falls into the "embedded platforms" category and is thus under Ben's responsibility. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare